TY - JOUR
T1 - Fluoride-containing water
T2 - A global perspective and a pursuit to sustainable water defluoridation management -An overview
AU - Lacson, Carl Francis Z.
AU - Lu, Ming Chun
AU - Huang, Yao Hui
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan ( MOST 107-2221-E-041-001-MY3 and MOST 106-2622-E006-037-CC2 ). Special sincerest gratitude goes to Do-Tien-Thịnh Bùi, Vũ Văn Trụ, and Patricia Permana Jati Hapsari for providing and translating their respective national water standards. Engr. Gabriel Garcia and Juan Gemo Lacson are greatly acknowledged for the enhancements of figures. Finally, the first author would like to acknowledge the support of the Filipino students in National Cheng Kung University especially for providing printouts of literature during this study’s review process.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107-2221-E-041-001-MY3 and MOST 106-2622-E006-037-CC2). Special sincerest gratitude goes to Do-Tien-Thịnh Bùi, Vũ Văn Trụ, and Patricia Permana Jati Hapsari for providing and translating their respective national water standards. Engr. Gabriel Garcia and Juan Gemo Lacson are greatly acknowledged for the enhancements of figures. Finally, the first author would like to acknowledge the support of the Filipino students in National Cheng Kung University especially for providing printouts of literature during this study's review process.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/1/20
Y1 - 2021/1/20
N2 - High levels of fluoride, though, naturally occurring (which can reach as high as 2,800 mg F−/L) in the environment can be toxic to various living organisms. Moreover, it can be transported by water and by its confluences and exacerbated by anthropogenic activities making it an environmental and public health concern. World Health Organization has set the standard for drinking water at 1.5 mg F−/L while the average national effluent standard is 15 mg F−/L. Hence, different defluoridation techniques of aqueous solutions were developed in the past years. This study provides an overview of the popular methods in defluoridation (i.e. adsorption, ion-exchangers, precipitation, membrane, electrocoagulation, and electro-dialysis). The mechanisms, critical operational conditions, and research progress are presented. The results further reveal that adsorption, regarded as the primary technique for defluoridation, still needs further development and mostly on its bench-scale and is only proven effective at low initial concentrations. In this study, sorption techniques are also estimated to be 10 to 20 times more expensive in operational costs relative to the other treatments. Furthermore, the majority of the examined literature demonstrated defluoridation at limited initial concentration <100 mg F−/L. In contrast, industrial effluents may reach 250–1,000 mg F−/L (up to ∼10,000 mg F−/L at extreme cases). Inadequate removal of fluoride in water by single treatment also compels researchers to explore hybrid treatments. In addition, due to the lack of wastewater treatment facilities requiring high capital cost, bioremediation, a commonly overlooked alternative, is presented for temporarily alleviating fluoride levels. Finally, challenges such as limited literature for disposal of secondary pollution and cost evaluation along with other potential research perspectives are further discussed.
AB - High levels of fluoride, though, naturally occurring (which can reach as high as 2,800 mg F−/L) in the environment can be toxic to various living organisms. Moreover, it can be transported by water and by its confluences and exacerbated by anthropogenic activities making it an environmental and public health concern. World Health Organization has set the standard for drinking water at 1.5 mg F−/L while the average national effluent standard is 15 mg F−/L. Hence, different defluoridation techniques of aqueous solutions were developed in the past years. This study provides an overview of the popular methods in defluoridation (i.e. adsorption, ion-exchangers, precipitation, membrane, electrocoagulation, and electro-dialysis). The mechanisms, critical operational conditions, and research progress are presented. The results further reveal that adsorption, regarded as the primary technique for defluoridation, still needs further development and mostly on its bench-scale and is only proven effective at low initial concentrations. In this study, sorption techniques are also estimated to be 10 to 20 times more expensive in operational costs relative to the other treatments. Furthermore, the majority of the examined literature demonstrated defluoridation at limited initial concentration <100 mg F−/L. In contrast, industrial effluents may reach 250–1,000 mg F−/L (up to ∼10,000 mg F−/L at extreme cases). Inadequate removal of fluoride in water by single treatment also compels researchers to explore hybrid treatments. In addition, due to the lack of wastewater treatment facilities requiring high capital cost, bioremediation, a commonly overlooked alternative, is presented for temporarily alleviating fluoride levels. Finally, challenges such as limited literature for disposal of secondary pollution and cost evaluation along with other potential research perspectives are further discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091907251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091907251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124236
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124236
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85091907251
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 280
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 124236
ER -