Abstract
A recent short communication [1] showed that an orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) classifier developed for hyperspectral image classification in [2] was equivalent to a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) resulting from a standard method of linear unmixing. It further concluded that the MLE subsumed the OSP classifier in spite of a constant difference in their magnitudes. Coincidentally, the equivalence of the OSP approach to linear unmixing was also derived in [3] and [4] by using the least-squares estimation with the same abundance estimate given by the MLE. In this communication, we show, on the contrary, that the MLE can be viewed as an a posteriori version of the OSP classifier and, thus, belongs to a family of OSP-based classifiers. More importantly, we further show that the constant produced by the MLE determines abundance estimation and has nothing to do with classification. As a result, it only alters the abundance concentration of the classified pixels, but not classification results.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1030-1032 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- General Earth and Planetary Sciences