Group reminiscence intervention in Taiwanese elders with dementia

Jing Jy Wang, Miaofen Yen, Wen Chen OuYang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on behavior competence and physical functioning and to compare effectiveness of the intervention by stage of dementia in Taiwanese elders residing in institutional settings. A longitudinal experimental design was used. Seventy-seven Taiwanese elderly participants completed the study; 38 in the intervention group and 39 in the control group. Participants in the intervention group received one reminiscence therapy session weekly for 8 weeks; those in the control group received regular nursing care. Barthel's index (BI) and the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly Behavior Rating Scale (CAPE-BRS) were administered pre- and post-intervention. Findings indicated that no significant differences between the intervention and control groups on overall behavioral competence (p = 0.12) or physical functioning (p = 0.44). However, slight overall improvement was identified, statistically significant for the social disturbance subscale of the CAPE-BRS was found (p = 0.011). There were no significant changes in overall behavior competence (p = 0.11) or physical functioning (p = 0.30) by stage of dementia (mild vs. moderate) in the intervention group, counter to the hypothesis. Although our results did not demonstrate a significant effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on overall behavior competency or on physical functioning in elders with dementia, we identified issues related to future implementation of this intervention, such as study power, chosen outcome measures, intervention dose, timing of outcome measures, or cultural applicability issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-232
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of gerontology and geriatrics
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 1

Fingerprint

reminiscence
dementia
Mental Competency
Dementia
Group Psychotherapy
Control Groups
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Group
Nursing Care
Research Design
rating scale
Behavior Rating Scale
nursing
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Ageing
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

@article{41141606c0664607b1723710b46f4875,
title = "Group reminiscence intervention in Taiwanese elders with dementia",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on behavior competence and physical functioning and to compare effectiveness of the intervention by stage of dementia in Taiwanese elders residing in institutional settings. A longitudinal experimental design was used. Seventy-seven Taiwanese elderly participants completed the study; 38 in the intervention group and 39 in the control group. Participants in the intervention group received one reminiscence therapy session weekly for 8 weeks; those in the control group received regular nursing care. Barthel's index (BI) and the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly Behavior Rating Scale (CAPE-BRS) were administered pre- and post-intervention. Findings indicated that no significant differences between the intervention and control groups on overall behavioral competence (p = 0.12) or physical functioning (p = 0.44). However, slight overall improvement was identified, statistically significant for the social disturbance subscale of the CAPE-BRS was found (p = 0.011). There were no significant changes in overall behavior competence (p = 0.11) or physical functioning (p = 0.30) by stage of dementia (mild vs. moderate) in the intervention group, counter to the hypothesis. Although our results did not demonstrate a significant effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on overall behavior competency or on physical functioning in elders with dementia, we identified issues related to future implementation of this intervention, such as study power, chosen outcome measures, intervention dose, timing of outcome measures, or cultural applicability issues.",
author = "Wang, {Jing Jy} and Miaofen Yen and OuYang, {Wen Chen}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.archger.2008.08.007",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "227--232",
journal = "Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics",
issn = "0167-4943",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Group reminiscence intervention in Taiwanese elders with dementia. / Wang, Jing Jy; Yen, Miaofen; OuYang, Wen Chen.

In: Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.09.2009, p. 227-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group reminiscence intervention in Taiwanese elders with dementia

AU - Wang, Jing Jy

AU - Yen, Miaofen

AU - OuYang, Wen Chen

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on behavior competence and physical functioning and to compare effectiveness of the intervention by stage of dementia in Taiwanese elders residing in institutional settings. A longitudinal experimental design was used. Seventy-seven Taiwanese elderly participants completed the study; 38 in the intervention group and 39 in the control group. Participants in the intervention group received one reminiscence therapy session weekly for 8 weeks; those in the control group received regular nursing care. Barthel's index (BI) and the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly Behavior Rating Scale (CAPE-BRS) were administered pre- and post-intervention. Findings indicated that no significant differences between the intervention and control groups on overall behavioral competence (p = 0.12) or physical functioning (p = 0.44). However, slight overall improvement was identified, statistically significant for the social disturbance subscale of the CAPE-BRS was found (p = 0.011). There were no significant changes in overall behavior competence (p = 0.11) or physical functioning (p = 0.30) by stage of dementia (mild vs. moderate) in the intervention group, counter to the hypothesis. Although our results did not demonstrate a significant effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on overall behavior competency or on physical functioning in elders with dementia, we identified issues related to future implementation of this intervention, such as study power, chosen outcome measures, intervention dose, timing of outcome measures, or cultural applicability issues.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on behavior competence and physical functioning and to compare effectiveness of the intervention by stage of dementia in Taiwanese elders residing in institutional settings. A longitudinal experimental design was used. Seventy-seven Taiwanese elderly participants completed the study; 38 in the intervention group and 39 in the control group. Participants in the intervention group received one reminiscence therapy session weekly for 8 weeks; those in the control group received regular nursing care. Barthel's index (BI) and the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly Behavior Rating Scale (CAPE-BRS) were administered pre- and post-intervention. Findings indicated that no significant differences between the intervention and control groups on overall behavioral competence (p = 0.12) or physical functioning (p = 0.44). However, slight overall improvement was identified, statistically significant for the social disturbance subscale of the CAPE-BRS was found (p = 0.011). There were no significant changes in overall behavior competence (p = 0.11) or physical functioning (p = 0.30) by stage of dementia (mild vs. moderate) in the intervention group, counter to the hypothesis. Although our results did not demonstrate a significant effect of structured group reminiscence therapy on overall behavior competency or on physical functioning in elders with dementia, we identified issues related to future implementation of this intervention, such as study power, chosen outcome measures, intervention dose, timing of outcome measures, or cultural applicability issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649987679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649987679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.archger.2008.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.archger.2008.08.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 18930560

AN - SCOPUS:67649987679

VL - 49

SP - 227

EP - 232

JO - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

JF - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

SN - 0167-4943

IS - 2

ER -