TY - JOUR
T1 - Household coverage, quality and costs of care provided by community health worker teams and the determining factors
T2 - Findings from a mixed methods study in South Africa
AU - Goudge, Jane
AU - De Kadt, Julia
AU - Babalola, Olukemi
AU - Muteba, Michel
AU - Tseng, Yu Hwei
AU - Malatji, Hlologelo
AU - Rwafa, Teurai
AU - Nxumalo, Nonhlanhla
AU - Levin, Jonathan
AU - Thorogood, Margaret
AU - Daviaud, Emmanuelle
AU - Watkins, Jocelyn
AU - Griffiths, Frances
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2020/8/20
Y1 - 2020/8/20
N2 - Objective Community health workers (CHWs) are undertaking more complex tasks as part of the move towards universal health coverage in South Africa. CHW programmes can improve access to care for vulnerable communities, but many such programmes struggle with insufficient supervision. In this paper, we assess coverage (proportion of households visited by a CHW in the past year and month), quality of care and costs of the service provided by CHW teams with differing configurations of supervisors, some based in formal clinics and some in community health posts. Participants CHW, their supervisors, clinic staff, CHW clients. Methods We used mixed methods (a random household survey, focus group discussions, interviews and observations of the CHW at work) to examine the performance of six CHW teams in vulnerable communities in Sedibeng, South Africa. Results A CHW had visited 17% of households in the last year, and we estimated they were conducting one to two visits per day. At household registration visits, the CHW asked half of the questions required. Respondents remembered 20%-25% of the health messages that CHW delivered from a visit in the last month, and half of the respondents took the action recommended by the CHW. Training, supervision and motivation of the CHW, and collaboration with other clinic staff, were better with a senior nurse supervisor. We estimated that if CHW carried out four visits a day, coverage would increase to 30%-90% of households, suggesting that some teams need more CHW, as well as better supervision. Conclusion Household coverage was low, and the service was limited. Support from the local facility was key to providing a quality service, and a senior supervisor facilitated this collaboration. Greater investment in numbers of CHW, supervisors, training and equipment is required for the potential benefits of the programme to be delivered.
AB - Objective Community health workers (CHWs) are undertaking more complex tasks as part of the move towards universal health coverage in South Africa. CHW programmes can improve access to care for vulnerable communities, but many such programmes struggle with insufficient supervision. In this paper, we assess coverage (proportion of households visited by a CHW in the past year and month), quality of care and costs of the service provided by CHW teams with differing configurations of supervisors, some based in formal clinics and some in community health posts. Participants CHW, their supervisors, clinic staff, CHW clients. Methods We used mixed methods (a random household survey, focus group discussions, interviews and observations of the CHW at work) to examine the performance of six CHW teams in vulnerable communities in Sedibeng, South Africa. Results A CHW had visited 17% of households in the last year, and we estimated they were conducting one to two visits per day. At household registration visits, the CHW asked half of the questions required. Respondents remembered 20%-25% of the health messages that CHW delivered from a visit in the last month, and half of the respondents took the action recommended by the CHW. Training, supervision and motivation of the CHW, and collaboration with other clinic staff, were better with a senior nurse supervisor. We estimated that if CHW carried out four visits a day, coverage would increase to 30%-90% of households, suggesting that some teams need more CHW, as well as better supervision. Conclusion Household coverage was low, and the service was limited. Support from the local facility was key to providing a quality service, and a senior supervisor facilitated this collaboration. Greater investment in numbers of CHW, supervisors, training and equipment is required for the potential benefits of the programme to be delivered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089768836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089768836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035578
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035578
M3 - Article
C2 - 32819939
AN - SCOPUS:85089768836
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 10
JO - BMJ open
JF - BMJ open
IS - 8
M1 - e035578
ER -