TY - GEN
T1 - How different presentation modes of graphical icons affect viewers’first fixation and attention
AU - Lin, Hsuan
AU - Lin, Wei
AU - Tsai, Wang Chin
AU - Hsieh, Yu Chen
AU - Wu, Fong Gong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This study aimed to explore how different presentation modes of graphical icons affect the viewer’s attention. The relevant experiment was designed to investigate three main variables: icon composition, polarity, and border. Through permutation and combination, six presentation modes were obtained as follows: line + positive polarity + border (M1), plane + positive polarity + border (M2), line + negative polarity + border (M3), plane + negative polarity + border (M4), line + positive polarity + no border (M5), and plane + positive polarity + no border (M6). Thirty-six participants were required to watch thirty stimuli, or graphical icons, presented concurrently in six abovementioned modes. The number of first fixations was recorded by eye-trackers; meanwhile, subjective evaluation of attention was conducted and analyzed. As indicated by the experimental results, the icons presented in M4 attracted the most attention; in contrast, the icons presented in M5 attracted the least attention. The findings herein can be used as a reference by interface designers while icons are being designed.
AB - This study aimed to explore how different presentation modes of graphical icons affect the viewer’s attention. The relevant experiment was designed to investigate three main variables: icon composition, polarity, and border. Through permutation and combination, six presentation modes were obtained as follows: line + positive polarity + border (M1), plane + positive polarity + border (M2), line + negative polarity + border (M3), plane + negative polarity + border (M4), line + positive polarity + no border (M5), and plane + positive polarity + no border (M6). Thirty-six participants were required to watch thirty stimuli, or graphical icons, presented concurrently in six abovementioned modes. The number of first fixations was recorded by eye-trackers; meanwhile, subjective evaluation of attention was conducted and analyzed. As indicated by the experimental results, the icons presented in M4 attracted the most attention; in contrast, the icons presented in M5 attracted the least attention. The findings herein can be used as a reference by interface designers while icons are being designed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945919490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945919490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-20681-3_21
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-20681-3_21
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84945919490
SN - 9783319206806
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 226
EP - 237
BT - Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction
A2 - Stephanidis, Constantine
A2 - Antona, Margherita
A2 - Stephanidis, Constantine
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 9th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, UAHCI 2015 Held as Part of 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2015
Y2 - 2 August 2015 through 7 August 2015
ER -