TY - JOUR
T1 - In-Plane Loading Tests and a Retrofitting Technique for Masonry Infill Panels in RC Frames with Eccentric Openings
AU - Tu, Yi Hsuan
AU - Tung, I. Ting
AU - Chiou, Tsung Chih
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) through funding MOST 104-2221-E-006-221-MY2 and by the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE), Taiwan. The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff at the NCREE Laboratory for supporting the experiments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - The use of masonry infills in reinforced concrete (RC)-framed structures implicates the strength of the frame and the seismic resistance of the building. The present study (1) experimentally investigated the behavior of masonry infill panels surrounded by RC frames with eccentric door openings, (2) proposed and evaluated a retrofitting method based on the experimental results, and (3) introduced an analytical masonry infill model that is currently used in seismic assessment for RC buildings in Taiwan. This study's retrofitting method centers on improving the confinement at the opening edge only instead of reinforcing the panel itself. Compared with existing methods, this method entails a lower retrofitting cost because a smaller area needs to be retrofitted. In experiments, the method notably improved the lateral resistance, where retrofitting yielded a 68% and 120% increase in strength in the push and pull directions, respectively. The confinement provided by the retrofit elements (1) allowed the damage on the panel to develop gradually; and (2) maintained the integrity of the panel during the test. Consequently, the drift at maximum strength significantly increased, and the panel could provide higher residual strength after a peak in strength. Although the deformation capacity was not improved because the retrofitting method did not alter the behavior of the columns, retrofitting yielded better energy dissipation due to a higher residual strength. Furthermore, the analytical masonry infill model generally agreed with the experimental data, although the displacements where the maximum strength occurred were underestimated and overestimated in the specimens with and without retrofitting, respectively.
AB - The use of masonry infills in reinforced concrete (RC)-framed structures implicates the strength of the frame and the seismic resistance of the building. The present study (1) experimentally investigated the behavior of masonry infill panels surrounded by RC frames with eccentric door openings, (2) proposed and evaluated a retrofitting method based on the experimental results, and (3) introduced an analytical masonry infill model that is currently used in seismic assessment for RC buildings in Taiwan. This study's retrofitting method centers on improving the confinement at the opening edge only instead of reinforcing the panel itself. Compared with existing methods, this method entails a lower retrofitting cost because a smaller area needs to be retrofitted. In experiments, the method notably improved the lateral resistance, where retrofitting yielded a 68% and 120% increase in strength in the push and pull directions, respectively. The confinement provided by the retrofit elements (1) allowed the damage on the panel to develop gradually; and (2) maintained the integrity of the panel during the test. Consequently, the drift at maximum strength significantly increased, and the panel could provide higher residual strength after a peak in strength. Although the deformation capacity was not improved because the retrofitting method did not alter the behavior of the columns, retrofitting yielded better energy dissipation due to a higher residual strength. Furthermore, the analytical masonry infill model generally agreed with the experimental data, although the displacements where the maximum strength occurred were underestimated and overestimated in the specimens with and without retrofitting, respectively.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138261002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138261002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003481
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003481
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138261002
SN - 0733-9445
VL - 148
JO - Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)
JF - Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)
IS - 11
M1 - 04022183
ER -