In vitro study of the revised ultrasound based real-time tracking of renal stones for shock wave lithotripsy: Part 1

Chien Chen Chang, Yong Ren Pu, Ioannis Manousakas, Shen Min Liang, Fan Ming Yu, Yat Ching Tong, Sheng Hsiang Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has been popular since the 1980s. Only 30% to 50% of the shock waves of all conventional lithotripters are focused on stones. We developed an ultrasound based, real-time stone tracking system (version 1) to improve accuracy and treatment efficiency. However, some problems remained. We revised the existing system (version 2) and tested its reliability and performance. Materials and Methods: We revised the system by adding more algorithms to decrease renal stone misidentification. We verified the advanced system by 2 tests using no tracking and tracking with 13 stone trajectories for versions 1 and 2. We performed the coincidence test to evaluate the accuracy of targeting the stone within the effective focal area and the stone fragmentation efficiency test to clarify the decrease in the number of shocks needed for stone fragmentation. Results: In the coincidence test the mean ± SD results of the nontracking system, and tracking versions 1 and 2 were 68.8% ± 18.8%, 89.9% ± 5.2% and 94.3% ± 4.5%, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.5 × 10-4). In the stone fragmentation efficiency test the mean results of the nontracking system, and versions 1 and 2 were 49.5% ± 14.2%, 85.1% ± 4.5% and 89.5% ± 4.2%, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.9 × 10 -8). Conclusions: The revised tracking system is better than version 1. It improves treatment efficiency, decreases stone misidentification and can shorten treatment time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2357-2363
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume189
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Lithotripsy
Kidney
Shock
In Vitro Techniques
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

Chang, Chien Chen ; Pu, Yong Ren ; Manousakas, Ioannis ; Liang, Shen Min ; Yu, Fan Ming ; Tong, Yat Ching ; Lin, Sheng Hsiang. / In vitro study of the revised ultrasound based real-time tracking of renal stones for shock wave lithotripsy : Part 1. In: Journal of Urology. 2013 ; Vol. 189, No. 6. pp. 2357-2363.
@article{ef60139064344b24b0c3de25e2aaa13b,
title = "In vitro study of the revised ultrasound based real-time tracking of renal stones for shock wave lithotripsy: Part 1",
abstract = "Purpose: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has been popular since the 1980s. Only 30{\%} to 50{\%} of the shock waves of all conventional lithotripters are focused on stones. We developed an ultrasound based, real-time stone tracking system (version 1) to improve accuracy and treatment efficiency. However, some problems remained. We revised the existing system (version 2) and tested its reliability and performance. Materials and Methods: We revised the system by adding more algorithms to decrease renal stone misidentification. We verified the advanced system by 2 tests using no tracking and tracking with 13 stone trajectories for versions 1 and 2. We performed the coincidence test to evaluate the accuracy of targeting the stone within the effective focal area and the stone fragmentation efficiency test to clarify the decrease in the number of shocks needed for stone fragmentation. Results: In the coincidence test the mean ± SD results of the nontracking system, and tracking versions 1 and 2 were 68.8{\%} ± 18.8{\%}, 89.9{\%} ± 5.2{\%} and 94.3{\%} ± 4.5{\%}, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.5 × 10-4). In the stone fragmentation efficiency test the mean results of the nontracking system, and versions 1 and 2 were 49.5{\%} ± 14.2{\%}, 85.1{\%} ± 4.5{\%} and 89.5{\%} ± 4.2{\%}, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.9 × 10 -8). Conclusions: The revised tracking system is better than version 1. It improves treatment efficiency, decreases stone misidentification and can shorten treatment time.",
author = "Chang, {Chien Chen} and Pu, {Yong Ren} and Ioannis Manousakas and Liang, {Shen Min} and Yu, {Fan Ming} and Tong, {Yat Ching} and Lin, {Sheng Hsiang}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.111",
language = "English",
volume = "189",
pages = "2357--2363",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

In vitro study of the revised ultrasound based real-time tracking of renal stones for shock wave lithotripsy : Part 1. / Chang, Chien Chen; Pu, Yong Ren; Manousakas, Ioannis; Liang, Shen Min; Yu, Fan Ming; Tong, Yat Ching; Lin, Sheng Hsiang.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 189, No. 6, 01.06.2013, p. 2357-2363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vitro study of the revised ultrasound based real-time tracking of renal stones for shock wave lithotripsy

T2 - Part 1

AU - Chang, Chien Chen

AU - Pu, Yong Ren

AU - Manousakas, Ioannis

AU - Liang, Shen Min

AU - Yu, Fan Ming

AU - Tong, Yat Ching

AU - Lin, Sheng Hsiang

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Purpose: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has been popular since the 1980s. Only 30% to 50% of the shock waves of all conventional lithotripters are focused on stones. We developed an ultrasound based, real-time stone tracking system (version 1) to improve accuracy and treatment efficiency. However, some problems remained. We revised the existing system (version 2) and tested its reliability and performance. Materials and Methods: We revised the system by adding more algorithms to decrease renal stone misidentification. We verified the advanced system by 2 tests using no tracking and tracking with 13 stone trajectories for versions 1 and 2. We performed the coincidence test to evaluate the accuracy of targeting the stone within the effective focal area and the stone fragmentation efficiency test to clarify the decrease in the number of shocks needed for stone fragmentation. Results: In the coincidence test the mean ± SD results of the nontracking system, and tracking versions 1 and 2 were 68.8% ± 18.8%, 89.9% ± 5.2% and 94.3% ± 4.5%, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.5 × 10-4). In the stone fragmentation efficiency test the mean results of the nontracking system, and versions 1 and 2 were 49.5% ± 14.2%, 85.1% ± 4.5% and 89.5% ± 4.2%, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.9 × 10 -8). Conclusions: The revised tracking system is better than version 1. It improves treatment efficiency, decreases stone misidentification and can shorten treatment time.

AB - Purpose: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has been popular since the 1980s. Only 30% to 50% of the shock waves of all conventional lithotripters are focused on stones. We developed an ultrasound based, real-time stone tracking system (version 1) to improve accuracy and treatment efficiency. However, some problems remained. We revised the existing system (version 2) and tested its reliability and performance. Materials and Methods: We revised the system by adding more algorithms to decrease renal stone misidentification. We verified the advanced system by 2 tests using no tracking and tracking with 13 stone trajectories for versions 1 and 2. We performed the coincidence test to evaluate the accuracy of targeting the stone within the effective focal area and the stone fragmentation efficiency test to clarify the decrease in the number of shocks needed for stone fragmentation. Results: In the coincidence test the mean ± SD results of the nontracking system, and tracking versions 1 and 2 were 68.8% ± 18.8%, 89.9% ± 5.2% and 94.3% ± 4.5%, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.5 × 10-4). In the stone fragmentation efficiency test the mean results of the nontracking system, and versions 1 and 2 were 49.5% ± 14.2%, 85.1% ± 4.5% and 89.5% ± 4.2%, respectively. Version 2 was statistically significantly better than version 1 (p = 1.9 × 10 -8). Conclusions: The revised tracking system is better than version 1. It improves treatment efficiency, decreases stone misidentification and can shorten treatment time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877630658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877630658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.111

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.111

M3 - Article

C2 - 23201381

AN - SCOPUS:84877630658

VL - 189

SP - 2357

EP - 2363

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -