Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status in the prediction of liver transplantation among patients with liver disease: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan

Chi Chu Liu, Chin Li Lu, Hari Basuki Notobroto, Chiang Chin Tsai, Pei Hung Wen, Chung-Yi Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Given the fact that >80% of liver transplantations (LTs) were living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Taiwan, we conducted this study to assess whether patients with lower socioeconomic status are subject to a lower chance of receiving hepatic transplantation.This was a cohort study including 197,082 liver disease patients admitted in 1997 to 2013, who were at higher risk of LT. Personal monthly income and median family income of living areas were used to indicate individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status, respectively. Cox proportional hazard model that considered death as a competing risk event was used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) of LT in association with socioeconomic status.Totally 2204 patients received LT during follow-up, representing a cumulative incidence of 1.12% and an incidence rate of 20.54 per 10 person-years. After adjusting for potential confounders, including age, sex, co-morbidity, location/urbanization level of residential areas, we found that patients with < median monthly income experienced significantly lower incidence of LT (aHR = 0.802, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.717-0.898), but those with >- median monthly income had significantly elevated incidence of LT (aHR = 1.679, 95% CI = 1.482-1.903), as compared to those who were not actively employed. Additionally, compared to areas with the lowest quartile of median family income, the highest quartile of median family income was also associated with significantly higher incidence rate of LT (aHR = 1.248, 95% CI = 1.055-1.478).Higher individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status were significantly associated with higher incidence of LT among patients with higher risk of LT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e14849
JournalMedicine
Volume98
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Social Class
Liver Transplantation
Liver Diseases
Cohort Studies
Population
Incidence
Urbanization
Living Donors
Proportional Hazards Models
Morbidity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Liu, Chi Chu ; Lu, Chin Li ; Notobroto, Hari Basuki ; Tsai, Chiang Chin ; Wen, Pei Hung ; Li, Chung-Yi. / Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status in the prediction of liver transplantation among patients with liver disease : A population-based cohort study in Taiwan. In: Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 98, No. 11. pp. e14849.
@article{9a34e79a07ef474ba5ed4f20252c2d68,
title = "Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status in the prediction of liver transplantation among patients with liver disease: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan",
abstract = "Given the fact that >80{\%} of liver transplantations (LTs) were living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Taiwan, we conducted this study to assess whether patients with lower socioeconomic status are subject to a lower chance of receiving hepatic transplantation.This was a cohort study including 197,082 liver disease patients admitted in 1997 to 2013, who were at higher risk of LT. Personal monthly income and median family income of living areas were used to indicate individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status, respectively. Cox proportional hazard model that considered death as a competing risk event was used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) of LT in association with socioeconomic status.Totally 2204 patients received LT during follow-up, representing a cumulative incidence of 1.12{\%} and an incidence rate of 20.54 per 10 person-years. After adjusting for potential confounders, including age, sex, co-morbidity, location/urbanization level of residential areas, we found that patients with < median monthly income experienced significantly lower incidence of LT (aHR = 0.802, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) = 0.717-0.898), but those with >- median monthly income had significantly elevated incidence of LT (aHR = 1.679, 95{\%} CI = 1.482-1.903), as compared to those who were not actively employed. Additionally, compared to areas with the lowest quartile of median family income, the highest quartile of median family income was also associated with significantly higher incidence rate of LT (aHR = 1.248, 95{\%} CI = 1.055-1.478).Higher individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status were significantly associated with higher incidence of LT among patients with higher risk of LT.",
author = "Liu, {Chi Chu} and Lu, {Chin Li} and Notobroto, {Hari Basuki} and Tsai, {Chiang Chin} and Wen, {Pei Hung} and Chung-Yi Li",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MD.0000000000014849",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "e14849",
journal = "Medicine (United States)",
issn = "0025-7974",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status in the prediction of liver transplantation among patients with liver disease : A population-based cohort study in Taiwan. / Liu, Chi Chu; Lu, Chin Li; Notobroto, Hari Basuki; Tsai, Chiang Chin; Wen, Pei Hung; Li, Chung-Yi.

In: Medicine, Vol. 98, No. 11, 01.03.2019, p. e14849.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status in the prediction of liver transplantation among patients with liver disease

T2 - A population-based cohort study in Taiwan

AU - Liu, Chi Chu

AU - Lu, Chin Li

AU - Notobroto, Hari Basuki

AU - Tsai, Chiang Chin

AU - Wen, Pei Hung

AU - Li, Chung-Yi

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Given the fact that >80% of liver transplantations (LTs) were living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Taiwan, we conducted this study to assess whether patients with lower socioeconomic status are subject to a lower chance of receiving hepatic transplantation.This was a cohort study including 197,082 liver disease patients admitted in 1997 to 2013, who were at higher risk of LT. Personal monthly income and median family income of living areas were used to indicate individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status, respectively. Cox proportional hazard model that considered death as a competing risk event was used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) of LT in association with socioeconomic status.Totally 2204 patients received LT during follow-up, representing a cumulative incidence of 1.12% and an incidence rate of 20.54 per 10 person-years. After adjusting for potential confounders, including age, sex, co-morbidity, location/urbanization level of residential areas, we found that patients with < median monthly income experienced significantly lower incidence of LT (aHR = 0.802, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.717-0.898), but those with >- median monthly income had significantly elevated incidence of LT (aHR = 1.679, 95% CI = 1.482-1.903), as compared to those who were not actively employed. Additionally, compared to areas with the lowest quartile of median family income, the highest quartile of median family income was also associated with significantly higher incidence rate of LT (aHR = 1.248, 95% CI = 1.055-1.478).Higher individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status were significantly associated with higher incidence of LT among patients with higher risk of LT.

AB - Given the fact that >80% of liver transplantations (LTs) were living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Taiwan, we conducted this study to assess whether patients with lower socioeconomic status are subject to a lower chance of receiving hepatic transplantation.This was a cohort study including 197,082 liver disease patients admitted in 1997 to 2013, who were at higher risk of LT. Personal monthly income and median family income of living areas were used to indicate individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status, respectively. Cox proportional hazard model that considered death as a competing risk event was used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) of LT in association with socioeconomic status.Totally 2204 patients received LT during follow-up, representing a cumulative incidence of 1.12% and an incidence rate of 20.54 per 10 person-years. After adjusting for potential confounders, including age, sex, co-morbidity, location/urbanization level of residential areas, we found that patients with < median monthly income experienced significantly lower incidence of LT (aHR = 0.802, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.717-0.898), but those with >- median monthly income had significantly elevated incidence of LT (aHR = 1.679, 95% CI = 1.482-1.903), as compared to those who were not actively employed. Additionally, compared to areas with the lowest quartile of median family income, the highest quartile of median family income was also associated with significantly higher incidence rate of LT (aHR = 1.248, 95% CI = 1.055-1.478).Higher individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status were significantly associated with higher incidence of LT among patients with higher risk of LT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063294310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063294310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000014849

DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000014849

M3 - Article

C2 - 30882681

AN - SCOPUS:85063294310

VL - 98

SP - e14849

JO - Medicine (United States)

JF - Medicine (United States)

SN - 0025-7974

IS - 11

ER -