Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: Part I-effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation

Shu Fen Chuang, Chih Han Chang, Peter Yaman, Li Tung Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the influence of enamel wetness on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation using various dentine bonding adhesives; and to determine the changes of marginal quality and enamel microcracks over time. Methods: Forty extracted molars were each prepared with a cylindrical cavity and divided into five groups. Groups 1-4 were acid-etched and treated separately with either an ethanol-based adhesive (Single Bond) or an acetone-based adhesive (Prime&Bond NT) on either dry or wet enamel. Teeth in Group 5 were treated with a self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Epoxy replicas of different stages were taken after cavity preparation, after restoration, after 24 h storage, and after thermocycling test. These replicas were examined under a scanning electron microscope for their restorative marginal quality and enamel microcrack. Quantitative measurement was performed to measure the length ratio of different margin patterns, and enamel microcracks. Results: There was no difference in the marginal quality when ethanol-base adhesive was applied on dry or wet dentin. The group using acetone-based adhesive on the dry enamel presented higher intact margin ratio than the group on wet enamel did only after restoration. Using self-etching primer led to higher open margin ratio at all stages. Enamel microcracks were found in all five groups and were higher in groups using acetone-based adhesives. Conclusion: Enamel wetness did not show a significantly adverse effect on the marginal quality of the restorations using either acetone- or ethanol-based adhesive. Using self-etching adhesive may lead to high incidence of margin deterioration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-351
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 May 1

Fingerprint

Dentin-Bonding Agents
Composite Resins
Dental Enamel
Adhesives
Acetone
Ethanol
Dentin
3-chloro-4,4-dimethyl-2-oxazolidinone
Tooth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{9dde501f3cf94dd8bcdbc3cf2886639b,
title = "Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: Part I-effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate the influence of enamel wetness on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation using various dentine bonding adhesives; and to determine the changes of marginal quality and enamel microcracks over time. Methods: Forty extracted molars were each prepared with a cylindrical cavity and divided into five groups. Groups 1-4 were acid-etched and treated separately with either an ethanol-based adhesive (Single Bond) or an acetone-based adhesive (Prime&Bond NT) on either dry or wet enamel. Teeth in Group 5 were treated with a self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Epoxy replicas of different stages were taken after cavity preparation, after restoration, after 24 h storage, and after thermocycling test. These replicas were examined under a scanning electron microscope for their restorative marginal quality and enamel microcrack. Quantitative measurement was performed to measure the length ratio of different margin patterns, and enamel microcracks. Results: There was no difference in the marginal quality when ethanol-base adhesive was applied on dry or wet dentin. The group using acetone-based adhesive on the dry enamel presented higher intact margin ratio than the group on wet enamel did only after restoration. Using self-etching primer led to higher open margin ratio at all stages. Enamel microcracks were found in all five groups and were higher in groups using acetone-based adhesives. Conclusion: Enamel wetness did not show a significantly adverse effect on the marginal quality of the restorations using either acetone- or ethanol-based adhesive. Using self-etching adhesive may lead to high incidence of margin deterioration.",
author = "Chuang, {Shu Fen} and Chang, {Chih Han} and Peter Yaman and Chang, {Li Tung}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.006",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "343--351",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents

T2 - Part I-effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation

AU - Chuang, Shu Fen

AU - Chang, Chih Han

AU - Yaman, Peter

AU - Chang, Li Tung

PY - 2006/5/1

Y1 - 2006/5/1

N2 - Objectives: To investigate the influence of enamel wetness on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation using various dentine bonding adhesives; and to determine the changes of marginal quality and enamel microcracks over time. Methods: Forty extracted molars were each prepared with a cylindrical cavity and divided into five groups. Groups 1-4 were acid-etched and treated separately with either an ethanol-based adhesive (Single Bond) or an acetone-based adhesive (Prime&Bond NT) on either dry or wet enamel. Teeth in Group 5 were treated with a self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Epoxy replicas of different stages were taken after cavity preparation, after restoration, after 24 h storage, and after thermocycling test. These replicas were examined under a scanning electron microscope for their restorative marginal quality and enamel microcrack. Quantitative measurement was performed to measure the length ratio of different margin patterns, and enamel microcracks. Results: There was no difference in the marginal quality when ethanol-base adhesive was applied on dry or wet dentin. The group using acetone-based adhesive on the dry enamel presented higher intact margin ratio than the group on wet enamel did only after restoration. Using self-etching primer led to higher open margin ratio at all stages. Enamel microcracks were found in all five groups and were higher in groups using acetone-based adhesives. Conclusion: Enamel wetness did not show a significantly adverse effect on the marginal quality of the restorations using either acetone- or ethanol-based adhesive. Using self-etching adhesive may lead to high incidence of margin deterioration.

AB - Objectives: To investigate the influence of enamel wetness on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation using various dentine bonding adhesives; and to determine the changes of marginal quality and enamel microcracks over time. Methods: Forty extracted molars were each prepared with a cylindrical cavity and divided into five groups. Groups 1-4 were acid-etched and treated separately with either an ethanol-based adhesive (Single Bond) or an acetone-based adhesive (Prime&Bond NT) on either dry or wet enamel. Teeth in Group 5 were treated with a self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Epoxy replicas of different stages were taken after cavity preparation, after restoration, after 24 h storage, and after thermocycling test. These replicas were examined under a scanning electron microscope for their restorative marginal quality and enamel microcrack. Quantitative measurement was performed to measure the length ratio of different margin patterns, and enamel microcracks. Results: There was no difference in the marginal quality when ethanol-base adhesive was applied on dry or wet dentin. The group using acetone-based adhesive on the dry enamel presented higher intact margin ratio than the group on wet enamel did only after restoration. Using self-etching primer led to higher open margin ratio at all stages. Enamel microcracks were found in all five groups and were higher in groups using acetone-based adhesives. Conclusion: Enamel wetness did not show a significantly adverse effect on the marginal quality of the restorations using either acetone- or ethanol-based adhesive. Using self-etching adhesive may lead to high incidence of margin deterioration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646530533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646530533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 16169654

AN - SCOPUS:33646530533

VL - 34

SP - 343

EP - 351

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 5

ER -