TY - JOUR
T1 - Input uncertainty on watershed modeling
T2 - Evaluation of precipitation and air temperature data by latent variables using SWAT
AU - Yen, Haw
AU - Wang, Ruoyu
AU - Feng, Qingyu
AU - Young, Chih Chieh
AU - Chen, Shien Tsung
AU - Tseng, Wen Hsiao
AU - Wolfe, June E.
AU - White, Michael J.
AU - Arnold, Jeffrey G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/10/15
Y1 - 2018/10/15
N2 - Latent variables (i.e., normally distributed random noise) provide valuable information regarding model input uncertainty. Watershed processes have been explored with sophisticated simulation models in the past few decades and researchers have found that incorporating the uncertainty attributed to forcing inputs, model parameters, and measured data, can help improve simulation results, however, not in all cases. Latent variable use requires careful consideration to determine if results are better or worse. In this study, latent variables were implemented to both precipitation and air temperature data to investigate the influence on model predictions and associated predictive uncertainty by using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Results indicated that model predictions in terms of statistics, behavior solutions, and predictive uncertainty were substantially affected by applying latent variables on precipitation data but it does not guarantee improved performance. On the other hand, model responses did not denote similar performance by conducting the same approach to air temperature data. Ultimately, incorporating latent variables a priori proportionally may or may not improve model predictive uncertainty. Researchers should carefully consider latent variable potential benefits on model predictions before committing to further work or making important model-supported decisions.
AB - Latent variables (i.e., normally distributed random noise) provide valuable information regarding model input uncertainty. Watershed processes have been explored with sophisticated simulation models in the past few decades and researchers have found that incorporating the uncertainty attributed to forcing inputs, model parameters, and measured data, can help improve simulation results, however, not in all cases. Latent variable use requires careful consideration to determine if results are better or worse. In this study, latent variables were implemented to both precipitation and air temperature data to investigate the influence on model predictions and associated predictive uncertainty by using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Results indicated that model predictions in terms of statistics, behavior solutions, and predictive uncertainty were substantially affected by applying latent variables on precipitation data but it does not guarantee improved performance. On the other hand, model responses did not denote similar performance by conducting the same approach to air temperature data. Ultimately, incorporating latent variables a priori proportionally may or may not improve model predictive uncertainty. Researchers should carefully consider latent variable potential benefits on model predictions before committing to further work or making important model-supported decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050181816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050181816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.07.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.07.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050181816
SN - 0925-8574
VL - 122
SP - 16
EP - 26
JO - Ecological Engineering
JF - Ecological Engineering
ER -