Is archaeology conceivable within the degrowth movement?

Nicolas Zorzin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1980s, archaeology has been further embedded in a reinforced and accelerating capitalist ideology, namely neo-liberalism. Most archaeologists had no alternative but to adapt to it through concessions to the free-market economy and to the so-called mitigations taking place within development. However, it is now apparent that the ongoing global socio-ecological disaster we are facing cannot be reversed with compromises but rather with a radical engagement against the injunctions of competition and growth. I suggest that we must anticipate the necessary transformations of archaeology in the coming decades, before archaeology becomes a technical avatar of the neo-liberal dogma, or before its complete annihilation for being deemed 'superfluous' (Wurst 2019, 171) by the capitalist regime. In this paper, I will use the idea of 'degrowth' to propose a new paradigm for archaeology by applying the concepts of civil disobedience, voluntary simplicity, redistribution of means and the ethics of no-growth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalArchaeological Dialogues
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021 Jun

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Archaeology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is archaeology conceivable within the degrowth movement?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this