Lifecycle performance assessment of fuel cell/battery electric vehicles

Jenn Jiang Hwang, Jenn Kun Kuo, Wei Wu, Wei Ru Chang, Chih Hong Lin, Song En Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper has performed an assessment of lifecycle (as known as well-to-wheels, WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption of a fuel cell vehicle (FCV). The simulation tool MATLAB/Simulink is employed to examine the real-time behaviors of an FCV, which are used to determine the energy efficiency and the fuel economy of the FCV. Then, the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation) model is used to analyze the fuel-cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions for hydrogen fuels. Three potential pathways of hydrogen production for FCV application are examined, namely, steam reforming of natural gas, water electrolysis using grid electricity, and water electrolysis using photovoltaic (PV) electricity, respectively. Results show that the FCV has the maximum system efficiency of 60%, which occurs at about 25% of the maximum net system power. In addition, the FCVs fueled with PV electrolysis hydrogen could reduce about 99.2% energy consumption and 46.6% GHG emissions as compared to the conventional gasoline vehicles (GVs). However, the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of the FCVs fueled with grid-electrolysis hydrogen are 35% and 52.8% respectively higher than those of the conventional GVs. As compared to the grid-based battery electric vehicles (BEVs), the FCVs fueled with reforming hydrogen from natural gas are about 79.0% and 66.4% in the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3433-3446
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Mar 19

Fingerprint

fuel cells
electric batteries
Fuel cells
Gas emissions
greenhouses
Greenhouse gases
vehicles
energy consumption
Electrolysis
Energy utilization
electrolysis
gases
gasoline
grids
natural gas
Hydrogen
electricity
Gasoline
Natural gas
Electricity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Fuel Technology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Hwang, Jenn Jiang ; Kuo, Jenn Kun ; Wu, Wei ; Chang, Wei Ru ; Lin, Chih Hong ; Wang, Song En. / Lifecycle performance assessment of fuel cell/battery electric vehicles. In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 3433-3446.
@article{0a03e1520a2b40c988c399ffa25f83e6,
title = "Lifecycle performance assessment of fuel cell/battery electric vehicles",
abstract = "This paper has performed an assessment of lifecycle (as known as well-to-wheels, WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption of a fuel cell vehicle (FCV). The simulation tool MATLAB/Simulink is employed to examine the real-time behaviors of an FCV, which are used to determine the energy efficiency and the fuel economy of the FCV. Then, the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation) model is used to analyze the fuel-cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions for hydrogen fuels. Three potential pathways of hydrogen production for FCV application are examined, namely, steam reforming of natural gas, water electrolysis using grid electricity, and water electrolysis using photovoltaic (PV) electricity, respectively. Results show that the FCV has the maximum system efficiency of 60{\%}, which occurs at about 25{\%} of the maximum net system power. In addition, the FCVs fueled with PV electrolysis hydrogen could reduce about 99.2{\%} energy consumption and 46.6{\%} GHG emissions as compared to the conventional gasoline vehicles (GVs). However, the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of the FCVs fueled with grid-electrolysis hydrogen are 35{\%} and 52.8{\%} respectively higher than those of the conventional GVs. As compared to the grid-based battery electric vehicles (BEVs), the FCVs fueled with reforming hydrogen from natural gas are about 79.0{\%} and 66.4{\%} in the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions, respectively.",
author = "Hwang, {Jenn Jiang} and Kuo, {Jenn Kun} and Wei Wu and Chang, {Wei Ru} and Lin, {Chih Hong} and Wang, {Song En}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.148",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "3433--3446",
journal = "International Journal of Hydrogen Energy",
issn = "0360-3199",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

Lifecycle performance assessment of fuel cell/battery electric vehicles. / Hwang, Jenn Jiang; Kuo, Jenn Kun; Wu, Wei; Chang, Wei Ru; Lin, Chih Hong; Wang, Song En.

In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 38, No. 8, 19.03.2013, p. 3433-3446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lifecycle performance assessment of fuel cell/battery electric vehicles

AU - Hwang, Jenn Jiang

AU - Kuo, Jenn Kun

AU - Wu, Wei

AU - Chang, Wei Ru

AU - Lin, Chih Hong

AU - Wang, Song En

PY - 2013/3/19

Y1 - 2013/3/19

N2 - This paper has performed an assessment of lifecycle (as known as well-to-wheels, WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption of a fuel cell vehicle (FCV). The simulation tool MATLAB/Simulink is employed to examine the real-time behaviors of an FCV, which are used to determine the energy efficiency and the fuel economy of the FCV. Then, the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation) model is used to analyze the fuel-cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions for hydrogen fuels. Three potential pathways of hydrogen production for FCV application are examined, namely, steam reforming of natural gas, water electrolysis using grid electricity, and water electrolysis using photovoltaic (PV) electricity, respectively. Results show that the FCV has the maximum system efficiency of 60%, which occurs at about 25% of the maximum net system power. In addition, the FCVs fueled with PV electrolysis hydrogen could reduce about 99.2% energy consumption and 46.6% GHG emissions as compared to the conventional gasoline vehicles (GVs). However, the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of the FCVs fueled with grid-electrolysis hydrogen are 35% and 52.8% respectively higher than those of the conventional GVs. As compared to the grid-based battery electric vehicles (BEVs), the FCVs fueled with reforming hydrogen from natural gas are about 79.0% and 66.4% in the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions, respectively.

AB - This paper has performed an assessment of lifecycle (as known as well-to-wheels, WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption of a fuel cell vehicle (FCV). The simulation tool MATLAB/Simulink is employed to examine the real-time behaviors of an FCV, which are used to determine the energy efficiency and the fuel economy of the FCV. Then, the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation) model is used to analyze the fuel-cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions for hydrogen fuels. Three potential pathways of hydrogen production for FCV application are examined, namely, steam reforming of natural gas, water electrolysis using grid electricity, and water electrolysis using photovoltaic (PV) electricity, respectively. Results show that the FCV has the maximum system efficiency of 60%, which occurs at about 25% of the maximum net system power. In addition, the FCVs fueled with PV electrolysis hydrogen could reduce about 99.2% energy consumption and 46.6% GHG emissions as compared to the conventional gasoline vehicles (GVs). However, the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of the FCVs fueled with grid-electrolysis hydrogen are 35% and 52.8% respectively higher than those of the conventional GVs. As compared to the grid-based battery electric vehicles (BEVs), the FCVs fueled with reforming hydrogen from natural gas are about 79.0% and 66.4% in the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions, respectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874665591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874665591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.148

DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.148

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 3433

EP - 3446

JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

SN - 0360-3199

IS - 8

ER -