TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinal changes in lumbar bone mineral density distribution may increase the risk of wedge fractures
AU - Giambini, Hugo
AU - Khosla, Sundeep
AU - Nassr, Ahmad
AU - Zhao, Chunfeng
AU - An, Kai Nan
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by internal funding from the Mayo Foundation and grant numbers R01 AR027065 (SK) and UL1TR000135 (Mayo CTSA) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) . The study sponsors had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data.
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - Background: Trabecular bone strength diminishes as a result of osteoporosis and altered biomechanical loading at the vertebral and spinal levels. The spine consists of the anterior, middle and posterior columns and the load supported by the anterior and middle columns will differ across different regions of the spine. Stress shielding of the anterior column can contribute to bone loss and increase the risk of wedge fracture. There is a lack of quantitative data related to regional spinal bone mineral density distribution over time. We hypothesize that there is an increase in the posterior-to-anterior vertebral body bone mineral density ratio and a decrease in whole-body bone mineral density over time. Methods: Bone mineral density was measured in 33 subjects using quantitative computed tomography scans for L1-L3 vertebrae, region (anterior and posterior vertebral body), and time (baseline and 6 years after). Findings: Lumbar bone mineral density decreased significantly (Δ: ~ 15%) from baseline to the 6th year visit. Individual vertebra differences over time (L1: ~ 14%, L2: ~ 14%, L3: ~ 17%) showed statistical significance. Anterior bone mineral density change was significantly greater than in the posterior vertebral body region (Δ anterior: ~ 18%; Δ posterior: ~ 13%). Posterior-to-anterior bone mineral density ratio was significantly greater in the 6th year compared to baseline values (mean (SD), 1.33 (0.2) vs. 1.23 (0.1)). Interpretation: This study provides longitudinal quantitative measurement of bone mineral density in vertebrae as well as regional changes in the anterior and posterior regions. Understanding bone mineral density distribution over time may help to decrease the risk of wedge fractures if interventions can be developed to bring spine loading to its normal state.
AB - Background: Trabecular bone strength diminishes as a result of osteoporosis and altered biomechanical loading at the vertebral and spinal levels. The spine consists of the anterior, middle and posterior columns and the load supported by the anterior and middle columns will differ across different regions of the spine. Stress shielding of the anterior column can contribute to bone loss and increase the risk of wedge fracture. There is a lack of quantitative data related to regional spinal bone mineral density distribution over time. We hypothesize that there is an increase in the posterior-to-anterior vertebral body bone mineral density ratio and a decrease in whole-body bone mineral density over time. Methods: Bone mineral density was measured in 33 subjects using quantitative computed tomography scans for L1-L3 vertebrae, region (anterior and posterior vertebral body), and time (baseline and 6 years after). Findings: Lumbar bone mineral density decreased significantly (Δ: ~ 15%) from baseline to the 6th year visit. Individual vertebra differences over time (L1: ~ 14%, L2: ~ 14%, L3: ~ 17%) showed statistical significance. Anterior bone mineral density change was significantly greater than in the posterior vertebral body region (Δ anterior: ~ 18%; Δ posterior: ~ 13%). Posterior-to-anterior bone mineral density ratio was significantly greater in the 6th year compared to baseline values (mean (SD), 1.33 (0.2) vs. 1.23 (0.1)). Interpretation: This study provides longitudinal quantitative measurement of bone mineral density in vertebrae as well as regional changes in the anterior and posterior regions. Understanding bone mineral density distribution over time may help to decrease the risk of wedge fractures if interventions can be developed to bring spine loading to its normal state.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872780457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872780457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.10.005
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.10.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 23142501
AN - SCOPUS:84872780457
SN - 0268-0033
VL - 28
SP - 10
EP - 14
JO - Clinical Biomechanics
JF - Clinical Biomechanics
IS - 1
ER -