TY - JOUR
T1 - Model-based optimal design of experiments -Semidefinite and nonlinear programming formulations
AU - Duarte, Belmiro P.M.
AU - Wong, Weng Kee
AU - Oliveira, Nuno M.C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research of Wong reported in this paper was partially supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01GM107639 . The contents in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/2/15
Y1 - 2016/2/15
N2 - We use mathematical programming tools, such as Semidefinite Programming (SDP) and Nonlinear Programming (NLP)-based formulations to find optimal designs for models used in chemistry and chemical engineering. In particular, we employ local design-based setups in linear models and a Bayesian setup in nonlinear models to find optimal designs. In the latter case, Gaussian Quadrature Formulas (GQFs) are used to evaluate the optimality criterion averaged over the prior distribution for the model parameters. Mathematical programming techniques are then applied to solve the optimization problems. Because such methods require the design space be discretized, we also evaluate the impact of the discretization scheme on the generated design. We demonstrate the techniques for finding D-, A- and E-optimal designs using design problems in biochemical engineering and show the method can also be directly applied to tackle additional issues, such as heteroscedasticity in the model. Our results show that the NLP formulation produces highly efficient D-optimal designs but is computationally less efficient than that required for the SDP formulation. The efficiencies of the generated designs from the two methods are generally very close and so we recommend the SDP formulation in practice.
AB - We use mathematical programming tools, such as Semidefinite Programming (SDP) and Nonlinear Programming (NLP)-based formulations to find optimal designs for models used in chemistry and chemical engineering. In particular, we employ local design-based setups in linear models and a Bayesian setup in nonlinear models to find optimal designs. In the latter case, Gaussian Quadrature Formulas (GQFs) are used to evaluate the optimality criterion averaged over the prior distribution for the model parameters. Mathematical programming techniques are then applied to solve the optimization problems. Because such methods require the design space be discretized, we also evaluate the impact of the discretization scheme on the generated design. We demonstrate the techniques for finding D-, A- and E-optimal designs using design problems in biochemical engineering and show the method can also be directly applied to tackle additional issues, such as heteroscedasticity in the model. Our results show that the NLP formulation produces highly efficient D-optimal designs but is computationally less efficient than that required for the SDP formulation. The efficiencies of the generated designs from the two methods are generally very close and so we recommend the SDP formulation in practice.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84954305646
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84954305646#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.12.014
DO - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.12.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954305646
SN - 0169-7439
VL - 151
SP - 153
EP - 163
JO - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
JF - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
ER -