TY - JOUR
T1 - Modulation of Biomarker Expression by Osimertinib
T2 - Results of the Paired Tumor Biopsy Cohorts of the AURA Phase I Trial
AU - Thress, Kenneth S.
AU - Jacobs, Vivien
AU - Angell, Helen K.
AU - Yang, James Chih Hsin
AU - Sequist, Lecia V.
AU - Blackhall, Fiona
AU - Su, Wu Chou
AU - Schuler, Martin
AU - Wolf, Jürgen
AU - Gold, Kathryn A.
AU - Cantarini, Mireille
AU - Barrett, J. Carl
AU - Jänne, Pasi A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study ( NCT01802632 ) was funded by AstraZeneca . The authors would like to thank all the patients included in this study and their families. In addition, the authors wish to thank the staff and investigators at each of the participating sites and acknowledge the contributions of Neil Smith, James Leeson, and Joseph Geradts. The authors would like to acknowledge Sarah Jane Rutherford, PhD, of iMed Comms, Macclesfield UK (an Ashfield Company and part of UDG Healthcare plc) for medical writing support that was funded by AstraZeneca in accordance with Good Publications Practice (GPP3) guidelines ( http://www.ismpp.org/gpp3 ).
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Introduction Osimertinib is an oral, potent, irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for EGFR TKI and T790M resistance mutations. To enhance understanding of osimertinib's mechanism of action, we aimed to evaluate the modulation of key molecular biomarkers after osimertinib treatment in paired clinical samples from the phase I AURA trial. Methods Paired tumor biopsy samples were collected before the study and after 15 plus or minus 7 days of osimertinib treatment (80 or 160 mg daily). Clinical efficacy outcomes were assessed according to whether viable paired biopsy samples could be collected; safety was also assessed. Immunohistochemical analyses assessed key pathway and tumor/immune-relevant markers (phospho-EGFR, phospho-S6, phospho-AKT, programmed death ligand 1, and CD8), with samples scored by image analysis or a pathologist blinded to treatment allocation. Results Predose tumor biopsy samples were collected from 61 patients with EGFR T790M tumors; 29 patients had no viable postdose biopsy sample because of tumor regression or insufficient tumor sample. Evaluable predose and postdose tumor biopsy samples were collected from 24 patients. Objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were improved in patients from whom a postdose biopsy sample could not be collected (ORR 62% and mPFS 9.7 months [p = 0.027]) compared with those from whom paired samples were collected (ORR 29% and mPFS 6.6 months). Osimertinib modulated key EGFR signaling pathways and led to increased immune cell infiltration. Conclusions Collection of paired biopsy samples was challenging because of rapid tumor regression after osimertinib treatment, highlighting the difficulties of performing on-study biopsies in patients treated with highly active drugs.
AB - Introduction Osimertinib is an oral, potent, irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for EGFR TKI and T790M resistance mutations. To enhance understanding of osimertinib's mechanism of action, we aimed to evaluate the modulation of key molecular biomarkers after osimertinib treatment in paired clinical samples from the phase I AURA trial. Methods Paired tumor biopsy samples were collected before the study and after 15 plus or minus 7 days of osimertinib treatment (80 or 160 mg daily). Clinical efficacy outcomes were assessed according to whether viable paired biopsy samples could be collected; safety was also assessed. Immunohistochemical analyses assessed key pathway and tumor/immune-relevant markers (phospho-EGFR, phospho-S6, phospho-AKT, programmed death ligand 1, and CD8), with samples scored by image analysis or a pathologist blinded to treatment allocation. Results Predose tumor biopsy samples were collected from 61 patients with EGFR T790M tumors; 29 patients had no viable postdose biopsy sample because of tumor regression or insufficient tumor sample. Evaluable predose and postdose tumor biopsy samples were collected from 24 patients. Objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were improved in patients from whom a postdose biopsy sample could not be collected (ORR 62% and mPFS 9.7 months [p = 0.027]) compared with those from whom paired samples were collected (ORR 29% and mPFS 6.6 months). Osimertinib modulated key EGFR signaling pathways and led to increased immune cell infiltration. Conclusions Collection of paired biopsy samples was challenging because of rapid tumor regression after osimertinib treatment, highlighting the difficulties of performing on-study biopsies in patients treated with highly active drugs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027704013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027704013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.07.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.07.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 28751247
AN - SCOPUS:85027704013
VL - 12
SP - 1588
EP - 1594
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
SN - 1556-0864
IS - 10
ER -