TY - JOUR
T1 - On the Determinants of the 2008 Financial Crisis:
T2 - A Bayesian Approach to the Selection of Groups and Variables
AU - Chen, Ray Bing
AU - Chen, Yi Chi
AU - Chu, Chi Hsiang
AU - Lee, Kuo Jung
PY - 2017/12/20
Y1 - 2017/12/20
N2 - We consider the determinants of the 2008 crisis and address two main forms of model uncertainty: The uncertainty in selecting theoretical groups and the uncertainty in selecting explanatory variables. We introduce Bayesian hierarchical formulation that allows for the joint treatment of group and variable selection using the Group-wise Gibbs sampler. Our group variable selection shows that pre-crisis financial policies and trade linkages play a particularly important role in explaining the severity of the crisis, alongside institutions, and within the selected groups we identify a broader set of variables correlated with the crisis, which in turn leads to an improvement in prediction performance. In the robustness analysis we also find that our results are not qualitatively changed on alternative measures of crisis intensity, different groupings of variables, or prior assumptions. We further argue that the established results in the literature may well be attributed to different prior choices used in the analysis.
AB - We consider the determinants of the 2008 crisis and address two main forms of model uncertainty: The uncertainty in selecting theoretical groups and the uncertainty in selecting explanatory variables. We introduce Bayesian hierarchical formulation that allows for the joint treatment of group and variable selection using the Group-wise Gibbs sampler. Our group variable selection shows that pre-crisis financial policies and trade linkages play a particularly important role in explaining the severity of the crisis, alongside institutions, and within the selected groups we identify a broader set of variables correlated with the crisis, which in turn leads to an improvement in prediction performance. In the robustness analysis we also find that our results are not qualitatively changed on alternative measures of crisis intensity, different groupings of variables, or prior assumptions. We further argue that the established results in the literature may well be attributed to different prior choices used in the analysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039052021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039052021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/snde-2016-0107
DO - 10.1515/snde-2016-0107
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85039052021
SN - 1081-1826
VL - 21
JO - Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics
JF - Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics
IS - 5
M1 - 20160107
ER -