On the efficiency of analyzing 3d anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies in BEM

Yui-Chuin Shiah, W. X. Sun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Due to a lack of closed-form solutions for three dimensional anisotropic bodies, the computational burden of evaluating the fundamental solutions in the boundary element method (BEM) has been a research focus over the years. In engineering practice, transversely isotropic material has gained popularity in the use of composites. As a degenerate case of the generally anisotropic material, transverse isotropy still needs to be treated separately to ease the computations. This paper aims to investigate the computational efficiency of the BEM implementations for 3D anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies. For evaluating the fundamental solutions of 3D anisotropy, the explicit formulations reported in [1,2] are implemented. For treating transversely isotropic materials, numerous closed form solutions have been reported in the literature. For the present study, the formulations presented by Pan and Chou [3] are particularly employed. At the end, a numerical example is presented to compare the computational efficiency of the three cases and to demonstrate how the CPU time varies with the number of meshes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-491
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Mechanics
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Transversely Isotropic
boundary element method
Boundary element method
Boundary Elements
Computational efficiency
Fundamental Solution
Closed-form Solution
formulations
Computational Efficiency
isotropy
Transverse Isotropy
mesh
Anisotropic Material
Formulation
engineering
CPU Time
anisotropy
Program processors
composite materials
Anisotropy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

@article{62b5b57e54c14b09a91aeb8367bb39c8,
title = "On the efficiency of analyzing 3d anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies in BEM",
abstract = "Due to a lack of closed-form solutions for three dimensional anisotropic bodies, the computational burden of evaluating the fundamental solutions in the boundary element method (BEM) has been a research focus over the years. In engineering practice, transversely isotropic material has gained popularity in the use of composites. As a degenerate case of the generally anisotropic material, transverse isotropy still needs to be treated separately to ease the computations. This paper aims to investigate the computational efficiency of the BEM implementations for 3D anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies. For evaluating the fundamental solutions of 3D anisotropy, the explicit formulations reported in [1,2] are implemented. For treating transversely isotropic materials, numerous closed form solutions have been reported in the literature. For the present study, the formulations presented by Pan and Chou [3] are particularly employed. At the end, a numerical example is presented to compare the computational efficiency of the three cases and to demonstrate how the CPU time varies with the number of meshes.",
author = "Yui-Chuin Shiah and Sun, {W. X.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1727719100004688",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "483--491",
journal = "Journal of Mechanics",
issn = "1727-7191",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

On the efficiency of analyzing 3d anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies in BEM. / Shiah, Yui-Chuin; Sun, W. X.

In: Journal of Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.01.2010, p. 483-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the efficiency of analyzing 3d anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies in BEM

AU - Shiah, Yui-Chuin

AU - Sun, W. X.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Due to a lack of closed-form solutions for three dimensional anisotropic bodies, the computational burden of evaluating the fundamental solutions in the boundary element method (BEM) has been a research focus over the years. In engineering practice, transversely isotropic material has gained popularity in the use of composites. As a degenerate case of the generally anisotropic material, transverse isotropy still needs to be treated separately to ease the computations. This paper aims to investigate the computational efficiency of the BEM implementations for 3D anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies. For evaluating the fundamental solutions of 3D anisotropy, the explicit formulations reported in [1,2] are implemented. For treating transversely isotropic materials, numerous closed form solutions have been reported in the literature. For the present study, the formulations presented by Pan and Chou [3] are particularly employed. At the end, a numerical example is presented to compare the computational efficiency of the three cases and to demonstrate how the CPU time varies with the number of meshes.

AB - Due to a lack of closed-form solutions for three dimensional anisotropic bodies, the computational burden of evaluating the fundamental solutions in the boundary element method (BEM) has been a research focus over the years. In engineering practice, transversely isotropic material has gained popularity in the use of composites. As a degenerate case of the generally anisotropic material, transverse isotropy still needs to be treated separately to ease the computations. This paper aims to investigate the computational efficiency of the BEM implementations for 3D anisotropic, transversely isotropic, and isotropic bodies. For evaluating the fundamental solutions of 3D anisotropy, the explicit formulations reported in [1,2] are implemented. For treating transversely isotropic materials, numerous closed form solutions have been reported in the literature. For the present study, the formulations presented by Pan and Chou [3] are particularly employed. At the end, a numerical example is presented to compare the computational efficiency of the three cases and to demonstrate how the CPU time varies with the number of meshes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650437243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650437243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1727719100004688

DO - 10.1017/S1727719100004688

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 483

EP - 491

JO - Journal of Mechanics

JF - Journal of Mechanics

SN - 1727-7191

IS - 4

ER -