Optimal adaptive selection of sampling sites

Chang-Tai Chao, Steven K. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Under an assumed population model, the optimal sampling strategy is often an adaptive one. In spatial statistics an important problem is that of optimally locating sample sites for estimation or prediction. In some cases a certain number of sampling sites have already been located and now one would like to optimally choose locations for a set of additional sites. If the optimal strategy is an adaptive one, then the selection of the new sites should take into account not only the locations of the existing sites but also the values of the variable of interest observed at those sites. In this paper, the optimal sampling strategy in two phases is examined and compared with the optimal conventional strategy. While the optimal conventional design is approximately a systematic arrangement of sampling sites, the optimal adaptive selection varies depending on the realized spatial distribution. The relative efficiency of the optimal (adaptive) strategy to the optimal conventional strategy, which is always greater than 1, is seen to be related to the range of influence of the spatial covariance function. Finally, the strategies are compared using data from a study of geothermal with CO2 emissions in Yellowstone National Park.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-538
Number of pages22
JournalEnvironmetrics
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Oct 16

Fingerprint

Optimal Strategy
sampling
Sampling Strategy
Spatial Statistics
national park
Adaptive Strategies
Covariance Function
Relative Efficiency
Population Model
spatial distribution
Spatial Distribution
Arrangement
prediction
Choose
Vary
Prediction
Range of data

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Ecological Modelling

Cite this

Chao, Chang-Tai ; Thompson, Steven K. / Optimal adaptive selection of sampling sites. In: Environmetrics. 2001 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 517-538.
@article{f1b697f13b0a49d781138c3cb932eaac,
title = "Optimal adaptive selection of sampling sites",
abstract = "Under an assumed population model, the optimal sampling strategy is often an adaptive one. In spatial statistics an important problem is that of optimally locating sample sites for estimation or prediction. In some cases a certain number of sampling sites have already been located and now one would like to optimally choose locations for a set of additional sites. If the optimal strategy is an adaptive one, then the selection of the new sites should take into account not only the locations of the existing sites but also the values of the variable of interest observed at those sites. In this paper, the optimal sampling strategy in two phases is examined and compared with the optimal conventional strategy. While the optimal conventional design is approximately a systematic arrangement of sampling sites, the optimal adaptive selection varies depending on the realized spatial distribution. The relative efficiency of the optimal (adaptive) strategy to the optimal conventional strategy, which is always greater than 1, is seen to be related to the range of influence of the spatial covariance function. Finally, the strategies are compared using data from a study of geothermal with CO2 emissions in Yellowstone National Park.",
author = "Chang-Tai Chao and Thompson, {Steven K.}",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/env.477",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "517--538",
journal = "Environmetrics",
issn = "1180-4009",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Optimal adaptive selection of sampling sites. / Chao, Chang-Tai; Thompson, Steven K.

In: Environmetrics, Vol. 12, No. 6, 16.10.2001, p. 517-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal adaptive selection of sampling sites

AU - Chao, Chang-Tai

AU - Thompson, Steven K.

PY - 2001/10/16

Y1 - 2001/10/16

N2 - Under an assumed population model, the optimal sampling strategy is often an adaptive one. In spatial statistics an important problem is that of optimally locating sample sites for estimation or prediction. In some cases a certain number of sampling sites have already been located and now one would like to optimally choose locations for a set of additional sites. If the optimal strategy is an adaptive one, then the selection of the new sites should take into account not only the locations of the existing sites but also the values of the variable of interest observed at those sites. In this paper, the optimal sampling strategy in two phases is examined and compared with the optimal conventional strategy. While the optimal conventional design is approximately a systematic arrangement of sampling sites, the optimal adaptive selection varies depending on the realized spatial distribution. The relative efficiency of the optimal (adaptive) strategy to the optimal conventional strategy, which is always greater than 1, is seen to be related to the range of influence of the spatial covariance function. Finally, the strategies are compared using data from a study of geothermal with CO2 emissions in Yellowstone National Park.

AB - Under an assumed population model, the optimal sampling strategy is often an adaptive one. In spatial statistics an important problem is that of optimally locating sample sites for estimation or prediction. In some cases a certain number of sampling sites have already been located and now one would like to optimally choose locations for a set of additional sites. If the optimal strategy is an adaptive one, then the selection of the new sites should take into account not only the locations of the existing sites but also the values of the variable of interest observed at those sites. In this paper, the optimal sampling strategy in two phases is examined and compared with the optimal conventional strategy. While the optimal conventional design is approximately a systematic arrangement of sampling sites, the optimal adaptive selection varies depending on the realized spatial distribution. The relative efficiency of the optimal (adaptive) strategy to the optimal conventional strategy, which is always greater than 1, is seen to be related to the range of influence of the spatial covariance function. Finally, the strategies are compared using data from a study of geothermal with CO2 emissions in Yellowstone National Park.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034829811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034829811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/env.477

DO - 10.1002/env.477

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 517

EP - 538

JO - Environmetrics

JF - Environmetrics

SN - 1180-4009

IS - 6

ER -