Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments

En Chi Chiu, Chia Lin Koh, Chia Yin Tsai, Wen Shian Lu, Ching-Fan Sheu, I. Ping Hsueh, Ching Lin Hsieh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate practice effect and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test (FDT) over four serial assessments in patients with stroke. Design: Single-group repeated measures design. Methods: Twenty-five patients with stroke were administered the FDT in four consecutive assessments every 2 weeks. The FDT contains four parts with five indices: 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', 'selective attention', 'alternating attention', 'ability of inhibition' and 'ability of switching'. Results: The five indices of the FDT showed trivial-to-small practice effects (Cohen's d=0.03-0.47) and moderate-to-excellent test-re-test reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient=0.59-0.97). Practice effects of the five indices all appeared cumulative, but one index, 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', reached a plateau after the second assessment. The minimum and maximum values of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of reliable change index modified for practice (RCIp) for this index were [-17.6, 11.2]. Conclusions: One of five indices of the FDT reached a plateau, whose minimum and maximum values of the 90% CI RCIp are useful to determine whether the change in an individual's score is real. However, clinicians and researchers should be cautious when interpreting the test results of these four indices over repeated assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1726-1733
Number of pages8
JournalBrain Injury
Volume28
Issue number13-14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Stroke
Confidence Intervals
Research Personnel
Test-retest Reliability

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Chiu, En Chi ; Koh, Chia Lin ; Tsai, Chia Yin ; Lu, Wen Shian ; Sheu, Ching-Fan ; Hsueh, I. Ping ; Hsieh, Ching Lin. / Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments. In: Brain Injury. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 13-14. pp. 1726-1733.
@article{6a4532ea68da45b39ea6a4a32dfd142f,
title = "Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate practice effect and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test (FDT) over four serial assessments in patients with stroke. Design: Single-group repeated measures design. Methods: Twenty-five patients with stroke were administered the FDT in four consecutive assessments every 2 weeks. The FDT contains four parts with five indices: 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', 'selective attention', 'alternating attention', 'ability of inhibition' and 'ability of switching'. Results: The five indices of the FDT showed trivial-to-small practice effects (Cohen's d=0.03-0.47) and moderate-to-excellent test-re-test reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient=0.59-0.97). Practice effects of the five indices all appeared cumulative, but one index, 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', reached a plateau after the second assessment. The minimum and maximum values of the 90{\%} confidence interval (CI) of reliable change index modified for practice (RCIp) for this index were [-17.6, 11.2]. Conclusions: One of five indices of the FDT reached a plateau, whose minimum and maximum values of the 90{\%} CI RCIp are useful to determine whether the change in an individual's score is real. However, clinicians and researchers should be cautious when interpreting the test results of these four indices over repeated assessments.",
author = "Chiu, {En Chi} and Koh, {Chia Lin} and Tsai, {Chia Yin} and Lu, {Wen Shian} and Ching-Fan Sheu and Hsueh, {I. Ping} and Hsieh, {Ching Lin}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/02699052.2014.947618",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1726--1733",
journal = "Brain Injury",
issn = "0269-9052",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "13-14",

}

Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments. / Chiu, En Chi; Koh, Chia Lin; Tsai, Chia Yin; Lu, Wen Shian; Sheu, Ching-Fan; Hsueh, I. Ping; Hsieh, Ching Lin.

In: Brain Injury, Vol. 28, No. 13-14, 01.12.2014, p. 1726-1733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments

AU - Chiu, En Chi

AU - Koh, Chia Lin

AU - Tsai, Chia Yin

AU - Lu, Wen Shian

AU - Sheu, Ching-Fan

AU - Hsueh, I. Ping

AU - Hsieh, Ching Lin

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Objectives: To investigate practice effect and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test (FDT) over four serial assessments in patients with stroke. Design: Single-group repeated measures design. Methods: Twenty-five patients with stroke were administered the FDT in four consecutive assessments every 2 weeks. The FDT contains four parts with five indices: 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', 'selective attention', 'alternating attention', 'ability of inhibition' and 'ability of switching'. Results: The five indices of the FDT showed trivial-to-small practice effects (Cohen's d=0.03-0.47) and moderate-to-excellent test-re-test reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient=0.59-0.97). Practice effects of the five indices all appeared cumulative, but one index, 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', reached a plateau after the second assessment. The minimum and maximum values of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of reliable change index modified for practice (RCIp) for this index were [-17.6, 11.2]. Conclusions: One of five indices of the FDT reached a plateau, whose minimum and maximum values of the 90% CI RCIp are useful to determine whether the change in an individual's score is real. However, clinicians and researchers should be cautious when interpreting the test results of these four indices over repeated assessments.

AB - Objectives: To investigate practice effect and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test (FDT) over four serial assessments in patients with stroke. Design: Single-group repeated measures design. Methods: Twenty-five patients with stroke were administered the FDT in four consecutive assessments every 2 weeks. The FDT contains four parts with five indices: 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', 'selective attention', 'alternating attention', 'ability of inhibition' and 'ability of switching'. Results: The five indices of the FDT showed trivial-to-small practice effects (Cohen's d=0.03-0.47) and moderate-to-excellent test-re-test reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient=0.59-0.97). Practice effects of the five indices all appeared cumulative, but one index, 'basic measures of attention and processing speed', reached a plateau after the second assessment. The minimum and maximum values of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of reliable change index modified for practice (RCIp) for this index were [-17.6, 11.2]. Conclusions: One of five indices of the FDT reached a plateau, whose minimum and maximum values of the 90% CI RCIp are useful to determine whether the change in an individual's score is real. However, clinicians and researchers should be cautious when interpreting the test results of these four indices over repeated assessments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911412400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911412400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02699052.2014.947618

DO - 10.3109/02699052.2014.947618

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1726

EP - 1733

JO - Brain Injury

JF - Brain Injury

SN - 0269-9052

IS - 13-14

ER -