TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting the hyperglycemic crisis death (PHD) score
T2 - A new decision rule for emergency and critical care
AU - Huang, Chien Cheng
AU - Kuo, Shu Chun
AU - Chien, Tsair Wei
AU - Lin, Hung Jung
AU - Guo, How Ran
AU - Chen, Wei Lung
AU - Chen, Jiann Hwa
AU - Chang, Su Hen
AU - Su, Shih Bin
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - AbstractBackground We investigated independent mortality predictors of hyperglycemic crises and developed a prediction rule for emergency and critical care physicians to classify patients into mortality risk and disposition groups. Methods This study was done in a university-affiliated medical center. Consecutive adult patients (> 18 years old) visiting the emergency department (ED) between January 2004 and December 2010 were enrolled when they met the criteria of a hyperglycemic crisis. Data were separated into derivation and validation sets - the former were used to predict the latter. December 31, 2008, was the cutoff date. Thirty-day mortality was the primary endpoint. Results We enrolled 295 patients who made 330 visits to the ED: derivation set = 235 visits (25 deaths: 10.6%), validation set = 95 visits (10 deaths: 10.5%). We found 6 independent mortality predictors: Absent tachycardia, Hypotension, Anemia, Severe coma, Cancer history, and Infection (AHA.SCI). After assigning weights to each predictor, we developed a Predicting Hyperglycemic crisis Death (PHD) score that stratifies patients into mortality-risk and disposition groups: low (0%) (95% CI, 0-0.02%): treatment in a general ward or the ED; intermediate (24.5%) (95% CI, 14.8-39.9%): the intensive care unit or a general ward; and high (59.5%) (95% CI, 42.2-74.8%): the intensive care unit. The area under the curve for the rule was 0.946 in the derivation set and 0.925 in the validation set. Conclusions The PHD score is a simple and rapid rule for predicting 30-day mortality and classifying mortality risk and disposition in adult patients with hyperglycemic crises.
AB - AbstractBackground We investigated independent mortality predictors of hyperglycemic crises and developed a prediction rule for emergency and critical care physicians to classify patients into mortality risk and disposition groups. Methods This study was done in a university-affiliated medical center. Consecutive adult patients (> 18 years old) visiting the emergency department (ED) between January 2004 and December 2010 were enrolled when they met the criteria of a hyperglycemic crisis. Data were separated into derivation and validation sets - the former were used to predict the latter. December 31, 2008, was the cutoff date. Thirty-day mortality was the primary endpoint. Results We enrolled 295 patients who made 330 visits to the ED: derivation set = 235 visits (25 deaths: 10.6%), validation set = 95 visits (10 deaths: 10.5%). We found 6 independent mortality predictors: Absent tachycardia, Hypotension, Anemia, Severe coma, Cancer history, and Infection (AHA.SCI). After assigning weights to each predictor, we developed a Predicting Hyperglycemic crisis Death (PHD) score that stratifies patients into mortality-risk and disposition groups: low (0%) (95% CI, 0-0.02%): treatment in a general ward or the ED; intermediate (24.5%) (95% CI, 14.8-39.9%): the intensive care unit or a general ward; and high (59.5%) (95% CI, 42.2-74.8%): the intensive care unit. The area under the curve for the rule was 0.946 in the derivation set and 0.925 in the validation set. Conclusions The PHD score is a simple and rapid rule for predicting 30-day mortality and classifying mortality risk and disposition in adult patients with hyperglycemic crises.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877712297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877712297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.02.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.02.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 23602758
AN - SCOPUS:84877712297
SN - 0735-6757
VL - 31
SP - 830
EP - 834
JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 5
ER -