Quantitative analysis of oncology professional learning preferences

Thomas J. George, Rami Manochakian, Marie Wood, Maura Polansky, Allyson Baer, Anne Grupe, Yu Shyr, Cathy Wang, Jennifer Williams, Leora Horn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE ASCO is the premier and largest global professional society for oncology care professionals. In 2015, ASCO launched a longitudinal Learning Cohort Pilot Project to catalog and better understand the learning behaviors and preferences of oncology health care providers. A secondary goal was to assess learner preferences and utilization related to ASCO’s portfolio of educational resources. METHODS The Learning Cohort Pilot Project was conducted between November 2015 and August 2016 with 49 ASCO members. Participants were selected via convenience sampling and stratified random sampling to generate a cohort that mirrored the demographic distribution of overall ASCO membership. Participants completed a different ASCO resource-specific feedback activity each month, which measured professional educational needs, sources sought, and preferences for educational resources. Responses were organized by demographic variables in our participant pool to identify trends in provider learning preferences. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between participant demographics and practice setting and responses. Holm’s procedure was used to adjust for multiple testing. RESULTS The Learning Cohort Pilot Project revealed statistically significant relationships between participant demographic variables and learning preferences. Age and practice setting were the demographic variables most consistently associated with the different preferences explored throughout the targeted activities. CONCLUSION The results of this pilot cohort reinforced the hypothesis that oncology care providers have different professional educational needs and preferences that can be potentially anticipated and met with tailored resources. Delivering solutions to meet these needs represents an opportunity for further research and resource development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E155-E165
JournalJCO Oncology Practice
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Feb 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative analysis of oncology professional learning preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    George, T. J., Manochakian, R., Wood, M., Polansky, M., Baer, A., Grupe, A., Shyr, Y., Wang, C., Williams, J., & Horn, L. (2020). Quantitative analysis of oncology professional learning preferences. JCO Oncology Practice, 16(2), E155-E165. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00731