Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Berthold Georg Englert; Kelvin Horia; Jibo Dai; Yink Loong Len; Hui Khoon Ng

doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Berthold Georg Englert
, Kelvin Horia
, Jibo Dai
, Yink Loong Len
, Hui Khoon Ng

Department of Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

Original language	English
Article number	026104
Journal	Physical Review A
Volume	99
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104
Publication status	Published - 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

Cite this

@article{8442d8e8cf7a412ca3a64b0d431cac0e,

title = "Reply to {"}comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' {"}",

abstract = "We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.",

author = "Englert, \{Berthold Georg\} and Kelvin Horia and Jibo Dai and Len, \{Yink Loong\} and Ng, \{Hui Khoon\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 American Physical Society.",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104",

language = "English",

volume = "99",

journal = "Physical Review A",

issn = "2469-9926",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

AU - Englert, Berthold Georg

AU - Horia, Kelvin

AU - Dai, Jibo

AU - Len, Yink Loong

AU - Ng, Hui Khoon

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

AB - We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062449320

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062449320#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062449320

SN - 2469-9926

VL - 99

JO - Physical Review A

JF - Physical Review A

IS - 2

M1 - 026104

ER -

Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this