TY - JOUR
T1 - RESEARCH ARTICLE Treatment patterns and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States and Taiwan
AU - Lin, Yih Jyh
AU - Lin, Chia Ni
AU - Sedghi, Tannaz
AU - Hsu, Sylvia H.
AU - Gross, Cary P.
AU - Jung,
AU - Wang, Der
AU - Wang, Shi Yi
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: Dr. Wang receives research support from Genentech. Dr. Gross is on a grant sponsored by National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Pfizer, receives research support from Johnson & Johnson, and support for travel from Flatiron, Inc. These sources of support were not used for any portion of the current manuscript. None of the other coauthors have conflicts to report.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2020 Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Background Survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is lower in the USA than in Taiwan. Little is known about the extent to which differences in stage at diagnosis and treatment contribute to this difference. We examined treatment patterns and survival in HCC and analyzed factors driving the difference. Methods Using a uniform methodology, we identified patients aged 66 years and older with newly diagnosed HCC between 2004 and 2011 in the USA and Taiwan. We compared treatment within 6 months after HCC diagnosis and 2-year stage-specific survival between the two countries. Results Compared with patients in Taiwan (n = 32,987), patients in the USA (n = 7,003) were less likely to be diagnosed as stage IA (4% vs 8%) and II (13% vs 22%), or receive cancer-directed treatments (41% vs 58%; all p < .001). Stage-specific 2-year survival rates were lower in the USA than in Taiwan (stage IA: 57% vs 77%; stage IB: 38% vs 63%; stage II: 40% vs 57%, stage III: 14% vs 18%; stage IV: 4% vs 5%, respectively; all p < .001 except p = .018 for stage IV). Differences in age and sex (combined), stage, and receipt of treatment accounted for 3.8%, 17.0%, and 16.8% of the survival difference, respectively, leaving 62.5% unexplained. Conclusions Differential stage at diagnosis and treatment were substantially associated with the survival difference, but approximately two-thirds of the difference remained unexplained. Identifying the main drivers of the difference could help improve HCC survival in the USA.
AB - Background Survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is lower in the USA than in Taiwan. Little is known about the extent to which differences in stage at diagnosis and treatment contribute to this difference. We examined treatment patterns and survival in HCC and analyzed factors driving the difference. Methods Using a uniform methodology, we identified patients aged 66 years and older with newly diagnosed HCC between 2004 and 2011 in the USA and Taiwan. We compared treatment within 6 months after HCC diagnosis and 2-year stage-specific survival between the two countries. Results Compared with patients in Taiwan (n = 32,987), patients in the USA (n = 7,003) were less likely to be diagnosed as stage IA (4% vs 8%) and II (13% vs 22%), or receive cancer-directed treatments (41% vs 58%; all p < .001). Stage-specific 2-year survival rates were lower in the USA than in Taiwan (stage IA: 57% vs 77%; stage IB: 38% vs 63%; stage II: 40% vs 57%, stage III: 14% vs 18%; stage IV: 4% vs 5%, respectively; all p < .001 except p = .018 for stage IV). Differences in age and sex (combined), stage, and receipt of treatment accounted for 3.8%, 17.0%, and 16.8% of the survival difference, respectively, leaving 62.5% unexplained. Conclusions Differential stage at diagnosis and treatment were substantially associated with the survival difference, but approximately two-thirds of the difference remained unexplained. Identifying the main drivers of the difference could help improve HCC survival in the USA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092762251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092762251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0240542
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0240542
M3 - Article
C2 - 33052942
AN - SCOPUS:85092762251
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 10 October
M1 - e0240542
ER -