TY - JOUR
T1 - Response-adaptive treatment randomization for multiple comparisons of treatments with recurrent event responses
AU - Gao, Jingya
AU - Hu, Feifang
AU - Cheung, Siu Hung
AU - Su, Pei Fang
N1 - Funding Information:
The research conducted by Gao was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11731011), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (FRF-TP-20-069A1) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M690365). The research conducted by Su was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (MOST 109-2628-M-006-002-MY2).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Recurrent event responses are frequently encountered during clinical trials of treatments for certain diseases, such as asthma. The recurrence rates of different treatments are often compared by applying the negative binomial model. In addition, a balanced treatment-allocation procedure that assigns the same number of patients to each treatment is often applied. Recently, a response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedure has been developed for trials with recurrent event data, and has been shown to be superior to balanced treatment allocation. However, this response-adaptive treatment allocation procedure is only applicable for the comparison of two treatments. In this paper, we derive response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedures for trials which comprise several treatments. As pairwise comparisons and multiple comparisons with a control are two common multiple-testing scenarios in trials with more than two treatments, corresponding treatment-allocation procedures for these scenarios are also investigated. The redesign of two clinical studies illustrates the clinical benefits that would be obtained from our proposed response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedures.
AB - Recurrent event responses are frequently encountered during clinical trials of treatments for certain diseases, such as asthma. The recurrence rates of different treatments are often compared by applying the negative binomial model. In addition, a balanced treatment-allocation procedure that assigns the same number of patients to each treatment is often applied. Recently, a response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedure has been developed for trials with recurrent event data, and has been shown to be superior to balanced treatment allocation. However, this response-adaptive treatment allocation procedure is only applicable for the comparison of two treatments. In this paper, we derive response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedures for trials which comprise several treatments. As pairwise comparisons and multiple comparisons with a control are two common multiple-testing scenarios in trials with more than two treatments, corresponding treatment-allocation procedures for these scenarios are also investigated. The redesign of two clinical studies illustrates the clinical benefits that would be obtained from our proposed response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130063762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130063762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/09622802221095244
DO - 10.1177/09622802221095244
M3 - Article
C2 - 35484830
AN - SCOPUS:85130063762
SN - 0962-2802
VL - 31
SP - 1549
EP - 1565
JO - Statistical Methods in Medical Research
JF - Statistical Methods in Medical Research
IS - 8
ER -