TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of Self-efficacy in the Predictive Relationship of Motor Ability to Functional Performance After Task-Related Training in Stroke
T2 - A Secondary Analysis of Longitudinal Data
AU - Ma, Hui Ing
AU - Hung, Pei Hsuan
AU - Lin, Szu Hung
AU - Chuang, I. Ching
AU - Wu, Ching Yi
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (grant nos. CMRPD1I0032 , BMRP553 ), Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the Framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan (grant no. EMRPD1L0411 ), the Ministry of Science and Technology (grant no. MOST108-2314-B-182-040 -MY3 ) in Taiwan, and the National Health Research Institutes (grant no. NHRI-EX109-10604PI ) in Taiwan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objective: To determine whether self-efficacy (SE) mediates or moderates the relationship between motor ability at pretest and functional use of the affected arm at posttest in task-related training for stroke. Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study. Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation settings. Participants: Eighty patients with chronic stroke (N=80). Interventions: The training was delivered to the participants for 60-90 min/session, 3-5 sessions/wk for 4-6 weeks. The training involved specific robot-assisted, mirror, or combined therapy, followed by functional task practice for approximately 30 minutes in each session. Main Outcome Measures: The outcome measure was the perceived amount of functional arm use and quality of movement evaluated by the Motor Activity Log (MAL) at posttest. The predictor was scores on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)–Upper Extremity subscale at pretest. The tested mediator and moderator were scores on the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) at pretest and posttest. Results: The SSEQ scores at pretest and posttest moderated the predictive relationship of pretest FMA to posttest MAL. The interaction between pretest FMA and SSEQ accounted for an additional 3.14%-5.37% of the variance in the posttest MAL. The predictive relationship between FMA and MAL was its greatest when the SSEQ was high, with a less amplified positive relationship at low levels of SSEQ. Conclusions: The results suggest the evaluation of SE at pretest for a better prediction of an individual patient's functional arm use after an intervention and recommend aiming at SE during training to make the most of motor ability transferred to functional use. Future research may compare the effectiveness of task-related training with and without SE building to verify the findings of this study.
AB - Objective: To determine whether self-efficacy (SE) mediates or moderates the relationship between motor ability at pretest and functional use of the affected arm at posttest in task-related training for stroke. Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study. Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation settings. Participants: Eighty patients with chronic stroke (N=80). Interventions: The training was delivered to the participants for 60-90 min/session, 3-5 sessions/wk for 4-6 weeks. The training involved specific robot-assisted, mirror, or combined therapy, followed by functional task practice for approximately 30 minutes in each session. Main Outcome Measures: The outcome measure was the perceived amount of functional arm use and quality of movement evaluated by the Motor Activity Log (MAL) at posttest. The predictor was scores on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)–Upper Extremity subscale at pretest. The tested mediator and moderator were scores on the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) at pretest and posttest. Results: The SSEQ scores at pretest and posttest moderated the predictive relationship of pretest FMA to posttest MAL. The interaction between pretest FMA and SSEQ accounted for an additional 3.14%-5.37% of the variance in the posttest MAL. The predictive relationship between FMA and MAL was its greatest when the SSEQ was high, with a less amplified positive relationship at low levels of SSEQ. Conclusions: The results suggest the evaluation of SE at pretest for a better prediction of an individual patient's functional arm use after an intervention and recommend aiming at SE during training to make the most of motor ability transferred to functional use. Future research may compare the effectiveness of task-related training with and without SE building to verify the findings of this study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108256170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108256170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.017
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 33839104
AN - SCOPUS:85108256170
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 102
SP - 1588
EP - 1594
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 8
ER -