Settlement of footings on reinforced level sandy ground at peak footing loads

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Performance-based designs for footings placed on reinforced ground that take their ductile behaviour into account require better knowledge of the settlement of footings subjected to peak footing loads. The validity of theoretical formulae for ultimate bearing capacity and settlement for footings on reinforced level ground, proposed previously by the author, are examined, based on recent experimental evidence. It was found that the formula for the ultimate bearing capacity increase in reinforced level sandy ground, based on the deep-footing and wide-slab mechanisms proposed by the author, works well in evaluating ultimate bearing capacity ratios for footings placed on level ground reinforced with high-tensile-stiffness reinforcement. The upper and lower bounds for footing settlements under peak footing loads were derived based on 42 loading test results. They were then applied to three additional series of loading tests using various types of reinforcing material, such as a relatively extensible polymeric mesh and three-dimensional geocell layers with a deep embedment. There was good agreement between the theoretical and measured values of ultimate footing settlement ratios for reinforced ground reinforced with a high-tensilestiffness geogrid. It was indicated that using three-dimensional geocell reinforcement with a deep embedment may generate greater footing settlements than those predicted by the upper-bound equation proposed here. It was also indicated that using high-tensile-stiffness geogrids in reinforced compacted dense sand tends to generate slightly lower values of ultimate footing settlement ratio, SRf, than those predicted using the lower-bound equation proposed here. Settlement characteristics of compacted sands, in contrast to the pluviated sands conventionally used for deriving experimental databases, may account for this discrepancy; this requires more study in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-136
Number of pages13
JournalGeosynthetics International
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jun 1

Fingerprint

footing
Bearing capacity
Sand
Reinforcement
Stiffness
Loads (forces)
bearing capacity
loading test
reinforcement
sand
stiffness
slab

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

@article{229e794e108045c1b067f34db6b3cc03,
title = "Settlement of footings on reinforced level sandy ground at peak footing loads",
abstract = "Performance-based designs for footings placed on reinforced ground that take their ductile behaviour into account require better knowledge of the settlement of footings subjected to peak footing loads. The validity of theoretical formulae for ultimate bearing capacity and settlement for footings on reinforced level ground, proposed previously by the author, are examined, based on recent experimental evidence. It was found that the formula for the ultimate bearing capacity increase in reinforced level sandy ground, based on the deep-footing and wide-slab mechanisms proposed by the author, works well in evaluating ultimate bearing capacity ratios for footings placed on level ground reinforced with high-tensile-stiffness reinforcement. The upper and lower bounds for footing settlements under peak footing loads were derived based on 42 loading test results. They were then applied to three additional series of loading tests using various types of reinforcing material, such as a relatively extensible polymeric mesh and three-dimensional geocell layers with a deep embedment. There was good agreement between the theoretical and measured values of ultimate footing settlement ratios for reinforced ground reinforced with a high-tensilestiffness geogrid. It was indicated that using three-dimensional geocell reinforcement with a deep embedment may generate greater footing settlements than those predicted by the upper-bound equation proposed here. It was also indicated that using high-tensile-stiffness geogrids in reinforced compacted dense sand tends to generate slightly lower values of ultimate footing settlement ratio, SRf, than those predicted using the lower-bound equation proposed here. Settlement characteristics of compacted sands, in contrast to the pluviated sands conventionally used for deriving experimental databases, may account for this discrepancy; this requires more study in the future.",
author = "Ching-Chuan Huang",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1680/gein.2011.18.3.124",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "124--136",
journal = "Geosynthetics International",
issn = "1072-6349",
publisher = "ICE Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Settlement of footings on reinforced level sandy ground at peak footing loads. / Huang, Ching-Chuan.

In: Geosynthetics International, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.06.2011, p. 124-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Settlement of footings on reinforced level sandy ground at peak footing loads

AU - Huang, Ching-Chuan

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Performance-based designs for footings placed on reinforced ground that take their ductile behaviour into account require better knowledge of the settlement of footings subjected to peak footing loads. The validity of theoretical formulae for ultimate bearing capacity and settlement for footings on reinforced level ground, proposed previously by the author, are examined, based on recent experimental evidence. It was found that the formula for the ultimate bearing capacity increase in reinforced level sandy ground, based on the deep-footing and wide-slab mechanisms proposed by the author, works well in evaluating ultimate bearing capacity ratios for footings placed on level ground reinforced with high-tensile-stiffness reinforcement. The upper and lower bounds for footing settlements under peak footing loads were derived based on 42 loading test results. They were then applied to three additional series of loading tests using various types of reinforcing material, such as a relatively extensible polymeric mesh and three-dimensional geocell layers with a deep embedment. There was good agreement between the theoretical and measured values of ultimate footing settlement ratios for reinforced ground reinforced with a high-tensilestiffness geogrid. It was indicated that using three-dimensional geocell reinforcement with a deep embedment may generate greater footing settlements than those predicted by the upper-bound equation proposed here. It was also indicated that using high-tensile-stiffness geogrids in reinforced compacted dense sand tends to generate slightly lower values of ultimate footing settlement ratio, SRf, than those predicted using the lower-bound equation proposed here. Settlement characteristics of compacted sands, in contrast to the pluviated sands conventionally used for deriving experimental databases, may account for this discrepancy; this requires more study in the future.

AB - Performance-based designs for footings placed on reinforced ground that take their ductile behaviour into account require better knowledge of the settlement of footings subjected to peak footing loads. The validity of theoretical formulae for ultimate bearing capacity and settlement for footings on reinforced level ground, proposed previously by the author, are examined, based on recent experimental evidence. It was found that the formula for the ultimate bearing capacity increase in reinforced level sandy ground, based on the deep-footing and wide-slab mechanisms proposed by the author, works well in evaluating ultimate bearing capacity ratios for footings placed on level ground reinforced with high-tensile-stiffness reinforcement. The upper and lower bounds for footing settlements under peak footing loads were derived based on 42 loading test results. They were then applied to three additional series of loading tests using various types of reinforcing material, such as a relatively extensible polymeric mesh and three-dimensional geocell layers with a deep embedment. There was good agreement between the theoretical and measured values of ultimate footing settlement ratios for reinforced ground reinforced with a high-tensilestiffness geogrid. It was indicated that using three-dimensional geocell reinforcement with a deep embedment may generate greater footing settlements than those predicted by the upper-bound equation proposed here. It was also indicated that using high-tensile-stiffness geogrids in reinforced compacted dense sand tends to generate slightly lower values of ultimate footing settlement ratio, SRf, than those predicted using the lower-bound equation proposed here. Settlement characteristics of compacted sands, in contrast to the pluviated sands conventionally used for deriving experimental databases, may account for this discrepancy; this requires more study in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958699965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958699965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1680/gein.2011.18.3.124

DO - 10.1680/gein.2011.18.3.124

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 124

EP - 136

JO - Geosynthetics International

JF - Geosynthetics International

SN - 1072-6349

IS - 3

ER -