TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulating bed evolution following the Barlin Dam (Taiwan, China) failure with implications for sediment dynamics modeling of dam removal
AU - Wang, Hsiao Wen
AU - Tullos, Desiree
AU - Kuo, Wei Cheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation / the World Association for Sedimentation and Erosion Research
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - The failure of the Barlin Dam in Taiwan, China offers an important case study for evaluating concepts in modeling the rapid erosion and channel recovery following intentional and unplanned dam removals. We present a modeling effort that applied a 1D and quasi-2D uncoupled hydraulics and sediment model (NETSTARS) to evaluate how discretization and parameterization influence thefitofbed elevationpredictions to observations following dam failure. Our analysis evaluated the model sensitivity to sediment transport function, active layer thickness, and number of stream tubes used to define the cross-section. Results indicate that a) the model is more sensitive to active layer thickness and sediment transport function than to the number of stream tubes, b) development of dam removal models are likely to benefit from varying the active layer thickness in time, and c) increased lateral discretization does not appear to improve model fit in the steep and rapidly changing river environment at our site. We conclude with discussion on differences between, identifying the need for, and general use of 1D, quasi-2D, and fully 2D models in dam removal and failure analysis.
AB - The failure of the Barlin Dam in Taiwan, China offers an important case study for evaluating concepts in modeling the rapid erosion and channel recovery following intentional and unplanned dam removals. We present a modeling effort that applied a 1D and quasi-2D uncoupled hydraulics and sediment model (NETSTARS) to evaluate how discretization and parameterization influence thefitofbed elevationpredictions to observations following dam failure. Our analysis evaluated the model sensitivity to sediment transport function, active layer thickness, and number of stream tubes used to define the cross-section. Results indicate that a) the model is more sensitive to active layer thickness and sediment transport function than to the number of stream tubes, b) development of dam removal models are likely to benefit from varying the active layer thickness in time, and c) increased lateral discretization does not appear to improve model fit in the steep and rapidly changing river environment at our site. We conclude with discussion on differences between, identifying the need for, and general use of 1D, quasi-2D, and fully 2D models in dam removal and failure analysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954306189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954306189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2015.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2015.01.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954306189
SN - 1001-6279
VL - 31
SP - 299
EP - 310
JO - International Journal of Sediment Research
JF - International Journal of Sediment Research
IS - 4
ER -