State differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death causal sequences on death certificates

Tain Junn Cheng, Tsung-Hsueh Lu, Ichiro Kawachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To examine state differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death (COD) causal sequences on death certificates in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to determine the prevalence of two types of incorrect COD causal sequences with data from the Multiple Cause Mortality File of the year 2004. RESULTS - Among deaths in which diabetes was reported as the first diagnosis on line a, b, c, or d in Part I of the death certificate in the U.S., 21% had below diabetes placement error (ranged from 30% in Maryland to 7% in Hawaii) and 11% had above diabetes placement error (ranged from 18% in Kentucky to 5% in California). The net effects of the two types of error ranged from 20.7% in Nevada to 19.6% in the District of Columbia. CONCLUSIONS - Because the rates of incorrect reporting of diabetes-related COD causal sequence varied across states, the comparability of the diabetes death rate between states may have been compromised.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1572-1574
Number of pages3
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Death Certificates
Cause of Death
Mortality
Research Design
Cross-Sectional Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialised Nursing

Cite this

@article{ddc69643aac6408cb94e1bc95e9488cc,
title = "State differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death causal sequences on death certificates",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE - To examine state differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death (COD) causal sequences on death certificates in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to determine the prevalence of two types of incorrect COD causal sequences with data from the Multiple Cause Mortality File of the year 2004. RESULTS - Among deaths in which diabetes was reported as the first diagnosis on line a, b, c, or d in Part I of the death certificate in the U.S., 21{\%} had below diabetes placement error (ranged from 30{\%} in Maryland to 7{\%} in Hawaii) and 11{\%} had above diabetes placement error (ranged from 18{\%} in Kentucky to 5{\%} in California). The net effects of the two types of error ranged from 20.7{\%} in Nevada to 19.6{\%} in the District of Columbia. CONCLUSIONS - Because the rates of incorrect reporting of diabetes-related COD causal sequence varied across states, the comparability of the diabetes death rate between states may have been compromised.",
author = "Cheng, {Tain Junn} and Tsung-Hsueh Lu and Ichiro Kawachi",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2337/dc11-2156",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1572--1574",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "7",

}

State differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death causal sequences on death certificates. / Cheng, Tain Junn; Lu, Tsung-Hsueh; Kawachi, Ichiro.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 35, No. 7, 01.07.2012, p. 1572-1574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - State differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death causal sequences on death certificates

AU - Cheng, Tain Junn

AU - Lu, Tsung-Hsueh

AU - Kawachi, Ichiro

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE - To examine state differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death (COD) causal sequences on death certificates in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to determine the prevalence of two types of incorrect COD causal sequences with data from the Multiple Cause Mortality File of the year 2004. RESULTS - Among deaths in which diabetes was reported as the first diagnosis on line a, b, c, or d in Part I of the death certificate in the U.S., 21% had below diabetes placement error (ranged from 30% in Maryland to 7% in Hawaii) and 11% had above diabetes placement error (ranged from 18% in Kentucky to 5% in California). The net effects of the two types of error ranged from 20.7% in Nevada to 19.6% in the District of Columbia. CONCLUSIONS - Because the rates of incorrect reporting of diabetes-related COD causal sequence varied across states, the comparability of the diabetes death rate between states may have been compromised.

AB - OBJECTIVE - To examine state differences in the reporting of diabetes-related incorrect cause-of-death (COD) causal sequences on death certificates in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to determine the prevalence of two types of incorrect COD causal sequences with data from the Multiple Cause Mortality File of the year 2004. RESULTS - Among deaths in which diabetes was reported as the first diagnosis on line a, b, c, or d in Part I of the death certificate in the U.S., 21% had below diabetes placement error (ranged from 30% in Maryland to 7% in Hawaii) and 11% had above diabetes placement error (ranged from 18% in Kentucky to 5% in California). The net effects of the two types of error ranged from 20.7% in Nevada to 19.6% in the District of Columbia. CONCLUSIONS - Because the rates of incorrect reporting of diabetes-related COD causal sequence varied across states, the comparability of the diabetes death rate between states may have been compromised.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862858428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862858428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/dc11-2156

DO - 10.2337/dc11-2156

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1572

EP - 1574

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 7

ER -