Statistical tests for homogeneity of variance for clinical trials and recommendations

Yuhang Zhou, Yiyang Zhu, Weng Kee Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In most clinical trials, the main interest is to test whether there are differences in the mean outcomes among the treatment groups. When the outcome is continuous, a common statistical test is a usual t-test for a two-group comparison. For more than 2 groups, an ANOVA setup is used and the test for equality for all groups is based on the F-distribution. A key assumption for these parametric tests is that data are normally, independently distributed and the response variances are equal. The robustness of these tests to the first two assumptions is quite well investigated, but the issues arising from heteroscedasticity are less studied. This paper reviews different methods for ascertaining homogeneity of variance across groups and investigates the consequences of heteroscedasticity on the tests. Simulations based on normal, heavy-tailed, and skewed normal data demonstrate that some of the less known methods, such as the Jackknife or Cochran's test, are quite effective in detecting differences in the variances.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101119
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Jun

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical tests for homogeneity of variance for clinical trials and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this