Abstract
Lai, Li, Conover, and Wu (2010) propose a four-factor financial distress model to explain stock returns in the U.S. and Japanese markets. We examine this model in the stock markets of Australia, and six Asian markets (Hong Kong, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand). We find broad empirical support for the four-factor financial distress risk asset-pricing model in those markets. The four-factor financial distress asset pricing model improves explanatory power beyond the Fama-French (1993) three-factor asset pricing model in six of the seven Asian-Pacific markets (12 of 14 portfolio groupings), while the Carhart (1997) momentum- based asset pricing model only improves explanatory power beyond the Fama-French model in three of the seven markets (4 of 14 portfolio groupings).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 123-158 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Research in Finance |
| Volume | 33 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stock returns and financial distress risk: Evidence from the Asian-Pacific markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver