Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone

In-line versus offset placements of implants

H. L. Huang, C. L. Lin, C. C. Ko, Chih-Han Chang, J. T. Hsu, Jehn-Shun Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three-dimensional, anisotropic finite element models were executed to investigate the biomechanical effects of in-line and offset placements of implants on implant-supported partial prostheses. Three implant placements of finite element models were created: in-line, buccal offset and lingual offset placements. The mesh models of a cadaver mandibular segment and a three-united crown containing the 2nd premolar, the 1st molar and the 2nd molar were constructed by computer tomography images. The material properties of mandible were applied as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Two loading modes (100N), vertical and oblique, were evaluated in all models. Insignificant difference was observed in implant stresses between the in-line and offset placements under the vertical loading mode. Under the oblique loading, however, the offset placement decreased the implant stress by a maximum of 17%. The maximum stress at cortical bone and trabecular bone around each implant did not show conspicuous difference between the in-line and offset placements. This study demonstrated the mechanisms of how stresses were distributed between the in-line and offset placements. Even though the offset placements showed the benefit of decreasing implant stresses, justified from the bone stress the offset placements provided no advantage for the stress decreasing over the in-line placement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)501-508
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Prostheses and Implants
Bone and Bones
Cheek
Bicuspid
Crowns
Mandible
Cadaver
Tongue
Tomography
Cancellous Bone
Cortical Bone

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{164fb8ffe4fe4f36888bfac68fba25f1,
title = "Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone: In-line versus offset placements of implants",
abstract = "Three-dimensional, anisotropic finite element models were executed to investigate the biomechanical effects of in-line and offset placements of implants on implant-supported partial prostheses. Three implant placements of finite element models were created: in-line, buccal offset and lingual offset placements. The mesh models of a cadaver mandibular segment and a three-united crown containing the 2nd premolar, the 1st molar and the 2nd molar were constructed by computer tomography images. The material properties of mandible were applied as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Two loading modes (100N), vertical and oblique, were evaluated in all models. Insignificant difference was observed in implant stresses between the in-line and offset placements under the vertical loading mode. Under the oblique loading, however, the offset placement decreased the implant stress by a maximum of 17{\%}. The maximum stress at cortical bone and trabecular bone around each implant did not show conspicuous difference between the in-line and offset placements. This study demonstrated the mechanisms of how stresses were distributed between the in-line and offset placements. Even though the offset placements showed the benefit of decreasing implant stresses, justified from the bone stress the offset placements provided no advantage for the stress decreasing over the in-line placement.",
author = "Huang, {H. L.} and Lin, {C. L.} and Ko, {C. C.} and Chih-Han Chang and Hsu, {J. T.} and Jehn-Shun Huang",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01598.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "501--508",
journal = "Journal of Oral Rehabilitation",
issn = "0305-182X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone : In-line versus offset placements of implants. / Huang, H. L.; Lin, C. L.; Ko, C. C.; Chang, Chih-Han; Hsu, J. T.; Huang, Jehn-Shun.

In: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Vol. 33, No. 7, 01.07.2006, p. 501-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone

T2 - In-line versus offset placements of implants

AU - Huang, H. L.

AU - Lin, C. L.

AU - Ko, C. C.

AU - Chang, Chih-Han

AU - Hsu, J. T.

AU - Huang, Jehn-Shun

PY - 2006/7/1

Y1 - 2006/7/1

N2 - Three-dimensional, anisotropic finite element models were executed to investigate the biomechanical effects of in-line and offset placements of implants on implant-supported partial prostheses. Three implant placements of finite element models were created: in-line, buccal offset and lingual offset placements. The mesh models of a cadaver mandibular segment and a three-united crown containing the 2nd premolar, the 1st molar and the 2nd molar were constructed by computer tomography images. The material properties of mandible were applied as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Two loading modes (100N), vertical and oblique, were evaluated in all models. Insignificant difference was observed in implant stresses between the in-line and offset placements under the vertical loading mode. Under the oblique loading, however, the offset placement decreased the implant stress by a maximum of 17%. The maximum stress at cortical bone and trabecular bone around each implant did not show conspicuous difference between the in-line and offset placements. This study demonstrated the mechanisms of how stresses were distributed between the in-line and offset placements. Even though the offset placements showed the benefit of decreasing implant stresses, justified from the bone stress the offset placements provided no advantage for the stress decreasing over the in-line placement.

AB - Three-dimensional, anisotropic finite element models were executed to investigate the biomechanical effects of in-line and offset placements of implants on implant-supported partial prostheses. Three implant placements of finite element models were created: in-line, buccal offset and lingual offset placements. The mesh models of a cadaver mandibular segment and a three-united crown containing the 2nd premolar, the 1st molar and the 2nd molar were constructed by computer tomography images. The material properties of mandible were applied as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Two loading modes (100N), vertical and oblique, were evaluated in all models. Insignificant difference was observed in implant stresses between the in-line and offset placements under the vertical loading mode. Under the oblique loading, however, the offset placement decreased the implant stress by a maximum of 17%. The maximum stress at cortical bone and trabecular bone around each implant did not show conspicuous difference between the in-line and offset placements. This study demonstrated the mechanisms of how stresses were distributed between the in-line and offset placements. Even though the offset placements showed the benefit of decreasing implant stresses, justified from the bone stress the offset placements provided no advantage for the stress decreasing over the in-line placement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745023619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745023619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01598.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01598.x

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 501

EP - 508

JO - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

SN - 0305-182X

IS - 7

ER -