TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence
T2 - Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost
AU - Guo, Jiin huarng
AU - Luh, Wei ming
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported by National Science Council of Taiwan grants NSC101-2410-H-153-001 to the first author, and NSC104-2410-H-006-015-MY3 to the second author. We wish to thank Prof. Yu-Sheng Hsu at Georgia State University for his helpful comments and the editor and reviewers for their insightful suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The British Psychological Society
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - The equality of two group variances is frequently tested in experiments. However, criticisms of null hypothesis statistical testing on means have recently arisen and there is interest in other types of statistical tests of hypotheses, such as superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence. Although these tests have become more common in psychology and social sciences, the corresponding sample size estimation for these tests is rarely discussed, especially when the sampling unit costs are unequal or group sizes are unequal for two groups. Thus, for finding optimal sample size, the present study derived an initial allocation by approximating the percentiles of an F distribution with the percentiles of the standard normal distribution and used the exhaustion algorithm to select the best combination of group sizes, thereby ensuring the resulting power reaches the designated level and is maximal with a minimal total cost. In this manner, optimization of sample size planning is achieved. The proposed sample size determination has a wide range of applications and is efficient in terms of Type I errors and statistical power in simulations. Finally, an illustrative example from a report by the Health Survey for England, 1995–1997, is presented using hypertension data. For ease of application, four R Shiny apps are provided and benchmarks for setting equivalence margins are suggested.
AB - The equality of two group variances is frequently tested in experiments. However, criticisms of null hypothesis statistical testing on means have recently arisen and there is interest in other types of statistical tests of hypotheses, such as superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence. Although these tests have become more common in psychology and social sciences, the corresponding sample size estimation for these tests is rarely discussed, especially when the sampling unit costs are unequal or group sizes are unequal for two groups. Thus, for finding optimal sample size, the present study derived an initial allocation by approximating the percentiles of an F distribution with the percentiles of the standard normal distribution and used the exhaustion algorithm to select the best combination of group sizes, thereby ensuring the resulting power reaches the designated level and is maximal with a minimal total cost. In this manner, optimization of sample size planning is achieved. The proposed sample size determination has a wide range of applications and is efficient in terms of Type I errors and statistical power in simulations. Finally, an illustrative example from a report by the Health Survey for England, 1995–1997, is presented using hypertension data. For ease of application, four R Shiny apps are provided and benchmarks for setting equivalence margins are suggested.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067358902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067358902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bmsp.12172
DO - 10.1111/bmsp.12172
M3 - Article
C2 - 31190402
AN - SCOPUS:85067358902
SN - 0007-1102
VL - 73
SP - 316
EP - 332
JO - British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
JF - British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
IS - 2
ER -