TY - JOUR
T1 - The clinical impact of the novel tumor marker DR-70 in unresectable gastric cancer patients
AU - Hung, Yi Ping
AU - Chen, Ming Huang
AU - Lin, June Seng
AU - Hsiao, Chin Fu
AU - Shan, Yan Shen
AU - Chen, Yeu Chin
AU - Chen, Li Tzong
AU - Liu, Tsang Wu
AU - Li, Chung Pin
AU - Chao, Yee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Background: Gastric cancer tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), have been applied in clinical practice to screen or monitor treatment responses. However, their sensitivity and specificity are unsatisfactory. Therefore, we assessed the novel tumor marker DR-70 and evaluated its performance in screening and response monitoring. Methods: The study included newly diagnosed patients with advanced gastric cancer from March 2012 to October 2015. We measured the DR-70, CEA, and CA 19-9 levels at the time of enrollment. The patients subsequently underwent chemotherapy. We followed-up the patients every 3 months; DR-70 levels and abdominal computed tomography scans were re-evaluated and repeated, respectively, at each follow-up. The correlation between treatment response and DR-70 level after chemotherapy was analyzed. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates were also evaluated. Results: A total of 51 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled. Most (82.4%) had metastatic disease. At enrollment, the sensitivity of DR-70 in our study group was 78.4%, compared with 52.9% and 43.1% for CEA and CA 19-9, respectively. When we used the three tumor markers together, the sensitivity increased to 80.4%. We observed a correlation between treatment response and DR-70 level after chemotherapy. No difference in either overall survival or progression-free survival was observed between the DR-70 positive and negative groups. However, a trend toward poorer overall survival was observed for the high DR-70 group, although this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: DR-70 is a powerful tool not only for screening unresectable gastric cancer but also for treatment response evaluation.
AB - Background: Gastric cancer tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), have been applied in clinical practice to screen or monitor treatment responses. However, their sensitivity and specificity are unsatisfactory. Therefore, we assessed the novel tumor marker DR-70 and evaluated its performance in screening and response monitoring. Methods: The study included newly diagnosed patients with advanced gastric cancer from March 2012 to October 2015. We measured the DR-70, CEA, and CA 19-9 levels at the time of enrollment. The patients subsequently underwent chemotherapy. We followed-up the patients every 3 months; DR-70 levels and abdominal computed tomography scans were re-evaluated and repeated, respectively, at each follow-up. The correlation between treatment response and DR-70 level after chemotherapy was analyzed. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates were also evaluated. Results: A total of 51 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled. Most (82.4%) had metastatic disease. At enrollment, the sensitivity of DR-70 in our study group was 78.4%, compared with 52.9% and 43.1% for CEA and CA 19-9, respectively. When we used the three tumor markers together, the sensitivity increased to 80.4%. We observed a correlation between treatment response and DR-70 level after chemotherapy. No difference in either overall survival or progression-free survival was observed between the DR-70 positive and negative groups. However, a trend toward poorer overall survival was observed for the high DR-70 group, although this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: DR-70 is a powerful tool not only for screening unresectable gastric cancer but also for treatment response evaluation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044986979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044986979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.01.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 29636231
AN - SCOPUS:85044986979
SN - 1726-4901
VL - 81
SP - 593
EP - 598
JO - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
IS - 7
ER -