TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of different electrical stimulation protocols on nerve regeneration through silicone conduits
AU - Cheng, Wen Ling
AU - Lin, Chou Ching K.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004/6
Y1 - 2004/6
N2 - Background: The effects of electrical stimulation on the regeneration of transected nerves through silicone rubber conduits may depend on the stimulation protocol. Methods: Rat sciatic nerve was transected and reconnected using a silicone rubber conduit with a 7-mm gap. The subjects were divided into nine groups. Each group received one protocol of electrical stimulation 30 minutes each day for 3 weeks. The effects of electrical stimulation were evaluated through morphologic methods. Results: Direct current stimulation increased nerve fiber bundle area without significantly affecting the number of myelinated fibers, resulting in decreased nerve fiber density. All the pulse current stimulation protocols as a group decreased the nerve fiber bundle area without affecting the number of myelinated fibers, resulting in increased nerve fiber density. Within the pulse current stimulation protocols, stimulation frequency affected nerve fiber density, whereas current strength did not. Conclusions: Stimulation protocols had significant influences on the benefit of electrical stimulation in nerve regeneration.
AB - Background: The effects of electrical stimulation on the regeneration of transected nerves through silicone rubber conduits may depend on the stimulation protocol. Methods: Rat sciatic nerve was transected and reconnected using a silicone rubber conduit with a 7-mm gap. The subjects were divided into nine groups. Each group received one protocol of electrical stimulation 30 minutes each day for 3 weeks. The effects of electrical stimulation were evaluated through morphologic methods. Results: Direct current stimulation increased nerve fiber bundle area without significantly affecting the number of myelinated fibers, resulting in decreased nerve fiber density. All the pulse current stimulation protocols as a group decreased the nerve fiber bundle area without affecting the number of myelinated fibers, resulting in increased nerve fiber density. Within the pulse current stimulation protocols, stimulation frequency affected nerve fiber density, whereas current strength did not. Conclusions: Stimulation protocols had significant influences on the benefit of electrical stimulation in nerve regeneration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142517818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142517818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.TA.0000071289.11767.22
DO - 10.1097/01.TA.0000071289.11767.22
M3 - Article
C2 - 15211132
AN - SCOPUS:3142517818
SN - 0022-5282
VL - 56
SP - 1241
EP - 1246
JO - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
JF - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
IS - 6
ER -