The feasibility of a video-based motion analysis system in measuring the segmental movements between upper and lower cervical spine

Shyi Kuen Wu, Howard H C Lan, Li-Chieh Kuo, Sen Wei Tsai, Chiung Ling Chen, Fong-chin Su

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) and static posture in the cervical spine are important in physical examination. Despite offering dynamic assessment without radiation, the video-based motion analysis system has not yet been applied to measure the cervical segmental movements. The purposes of this study were to develop a neck model to differentiate the movements and posture between upper and lower cervical spine, and to examine the reliability of measuring cervical motion with surface markers and the aid of videofluoroscopy. Sixteen healthy adult subjects (eight males and eight females) participated in this study. Ten surface markers were used to estimate the discrepancies in cervical vertebral angles compared with corresponding bony landmarks throughout the ROM. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the paired vertebral angles between surface markers and bony landmarks ranged from 0.844 to 0.975 and the mean absolute difference (MAD) averaged 2.96°. Our results indicate high consistency between surface markers and bony landmarks throughout the cervical movements. The mean upper (C0-C2) and lower (C2-C7) cervical joint angles in the neutral position were 18.59 ± 4.33° and 23.98 ± 6.15°, respectively. Furthermore, the reliability of the digitizing procedure within raters (ICC = 0.850-0.999; MAD = 0.58-2.42°) and between raters (ICC = 0.759-0.988; MAD = 0.59-2.66°) suggests that the neck motion analysis model is a feasible method for investigating static neck posture or dynamic motion between upper and lower cervical spine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-166
Number of pages6
JournalGait and Posture
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Spine
Posture
Neck
Articular Range of Motion
Physical Examination
Healthy Volunteers
Joints
Radiation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{a99c06ddb5914b9f861cac64cdd71371,
title = "The feasibility of a video-based motion analysis system in measuring the segmental movements between upper and lower cervical spine",
abstract = "The evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) and static posture in the cervical spine are important in physical examination. Despite offering dynamic assessment without radiation, the video-based motion analysis system has not yet been applied to measure the cervical segmental movements. The purposes of this study were to develop a neck model to differentiate the movements and posture between upper and lower cervical spine, and to examine the reliability of measuring cervical motion with surface markers and the aid of videofluoroscopy. Sixteen healthy adult subjects (eight males and eight females) participated in this study. Ten surface markers were used to estimate the discrepancies in cervical vertebral angles compared with corresponding bony landmarks throughout the ROM. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the paired vertebral angles between surface markers and bony landmarks ranged from 0.844 to 0.975 and the mean absolute difference (MAD) averaged 2.96°. Our results indicate high consistency between surface markers and bony landmarks throughout the cervical movements. The mean upper (C0-C2) and lower (C2-C7) cervical joint angles in the neutral position were 18.59 ± 4.33° and 23.98 ± 6.15°, respectively. Furthermore, the reliability of the digitizing procedure within raters (ICC = 0.850-0.999; MAD = 0.58-2.42°) and between raters (ICC = 0.759-0.988; MAD = 0.59-2.66°) suggests that the neck motion analysis model is a feasible method for investigating static neck posture or dynamic motion between upper and lower cervical spine.",
author = "Wu, {Shyi Kuen} and Lan, {Howard H C} and Li-Chieh Kuo and Tsai, {Sen Wei} and Chen, {Chiung Ling} and Fong-chin Su",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "161--166",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

The feasibility of a video-based motion analysis system in measuring the segmental movements between upper and lower cervical spine. / Wu, Shyi Kuen; Lan, Howard H C; Kuo, Li-Chieh; Tsai, Sen Wei; Chen, Chiung Ling; Su, Fong-chin.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.06.2007, p. 161-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The feasibility of a video-based motion analysis system in measuring the segmental movements between upper and lower cervical spine

AU - Wu, Shyi Kuen

AU - Lan, Howard H C

AU - Kuo, Li-Chieh

AU - Tsai, Sen Wei

AU - Chen, Chiung Ling

AU - Su, Fong-chin

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - The evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) and static posture in the cervical spine are important in physical examination. Despite offering dynamic assessment without radiation, the video-based motion analysis system has not yet been applied to measure the cervical segmental movements. The purposes of this study were to develop a neck model to differentiate the movements and posture between upper and lower cervical spine, and to examine the reliability of measuring cervical motion with surface markers and the aid of videofluoroscopy. Sixteen healthy adult subjects (eight males and eight females) participated in this study. Ten surface markers were used to estimate the discrepancies in cervical vertebral angles compared with corresponding bony landmarks throughout the ROM. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the paired vertebral angles between surface markers and bony landmarks ranged from 0.844 to 0.975 and the mean absolute difference (MAD) averaged 2.96°. Our results indicate high consistency between surface markers and bony landmarks throughout the cervical movements. The mean upper (C0-C2) and lower (C2-C7) cervical joint angles in the neutral position were 18.59 ± 4.33° and 23.98 ± 6.15°, respectively. Furthermore, the reliability of the digitizing procedure within raters (ICC = 0.850-0.999; MAD = 0.58-2.42°) and between raters (ICC = 0.759-0.988; MAD = 0.59-2.66°) suggests that the neck motion analysis model is a feasible method for investigating static neck posture or dynamic motion between upper and lower cervical spine.

AB - The evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) and static posture in the cervical spine are important in physical examination. Despite offering dynamic assessment without radiation, the video-based motion analysis system has not yet been applied to measure the cervical segmental movements. The purposes of this study were to develop a neck model to differentiate the movements and posture between upper and lower cervical spine, and to examine the reliability of measuring cervical motion with surface markers and the aid of videofluoroscopy. Sixteen healthy adult subjects (eight males and eight females) participated in this study. Ten surface markers were used to estimate the discrepancies in cervical vertebral angles compared with corresponding bony landmarks throughout the ROM. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the paired vertebral angles between surface markers and bony landmarks ranged from 0.844 to 0.975 and the mean absolute difference (MAD) averaged 2.96°. Our results indicate high consistency between surface markers and bony landmarks throughout the cervical movements. The mean upper (C0-C2) and lower (C2-C7) cervical joint angles in the neutral position were 18.59 ± 4.33° and 23.98 ± 6.15°, respectively. Furthermore, the reliability of the digitizing procedure within raters (ICC = 0.850-0.999; MAD = 0.58-2.42°) and between raters (ICC = 0.759-0.988; MAD = 0.59-2.66°) suggests that the neck motion analysis model is a feasible method for investigating static neck posture or dynamic motion between upper and lower cervical spine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247245182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247245182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.016

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 161

EP - 166

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 1

ER -