The learning potential of online student-constructed tests with citing peer-generated questions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In view of contribution-based pedagogy and observational learning theory, students’ perceived uses, preferences, usage, and selection considerations with regard to citing peers’ work were examined in an online learning environment targeting student-constructed tests. Data were collected from 84 fifth-grade students who participated in online student-constructed tests with and without citing in an 11-week study. Quantitative and qualitative data in response to an end-of-session questionnaire and actual online citing behaviour were analyzed. Several major findings were obtained. First, significantly more participants supported and preferred “citing” over “no citing” for online student-constructed tests. Second, data with regard to perceived uses, preferences, and reported usage all supported the potential of citing for providing an observational learning space. Third, citing allowed the participants to attend to areas pinpointed by their peers but initially ignored by them, thus making social construction of knowledge possible. Fourth, the quality and the author of the item are the two determining factors affecting citing decisions. Fifth, a statistically significant positive correlation between students’ academic achievement and their generated questions cited by peers was confirmed. Finally, actual online citing behaviour varied greatly among participants, with the majority using the citing function during online test-construction to various extents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-241
Number of pages16
JournalInteractive Learning Environments
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Feb 17

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The learning potential of online student-constructed tests with citing peer-generated questions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this