一次性醫療器材重消之契約責任──告知就沒責任嗎?

Translated title of the contribution: The Liability of Contract in Reusing of single use Medical Instruments after Disinfection: Is There No Responsibility with Disclosure?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Could the liability of the medical institutions be released after disclosure by reusing the single use medical instruments after disinfection? It might not be unimaginable according to the principle of contract freedom, but must belong to an acceptable medical costume in that time. Besides, the medical guideline shall not be broken. Reusing the disinfected medical instruments which is single use is available in this respect. According to good faith principle, the patient should be notified the risks about alternative medical instruments. Then the contract liability could be reduced.

Translated title of the contributionThe Liability of Contract in Reusing of single use Medical Instruments after Disinfection: Is There No Responsibility with Disclosure?
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)140-146
Journal月旦醫事法報告 = Angle Health Law Review
Volume42
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Apr

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Liability of Contract in Reusing of single use Medical Instruments after Disinfection: Is There No Responsibility with Disclosure?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this