The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the frequency modulated (FM) component of the calls

Dieter Vanderelst, Ya-Fu Lee, Inga Geipel, Elisabeth K.V. Kalko, Yen Min Kuo, Herbert Peremans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bats of the family Rhinolophidae emit their echolocation calls through their nostrils and feature elaborate noseleaves shaping the directionality of the emissions. The calls of these bats consist of a long constant-frequency component preceded and/or followed by short frequency-modulated sweeps. While Rhinolophidae are known for their physiological specializations for processing the constant frequency part of the calls, previous evidence suggests that the noseleaves of these animals are tuned to the frequencies in the frequency modulated components of the calls. In this paper, we seek further support for this hypothesis by simulating the emission beam pattern of the bat Rhinolophus formosae. Filling the furrows of lancet and removing the basal lappets (i.e., two flaps on the noseleaf) we find that these conspicuous features of the noseleaf focus the emitted energy mostly for frequencies in the frequencymodulated components. Based on the assumption that this component of the call is used by the bats for ranging, we develop a qualitative model to assess the increase in performance due to the furrows and/or the lappets. The model confirms that both structures decrease the ambiguity in selecting relevant targets for ranging. The lappets and the furrows shape the emission beam for different spatial regions and frequency ranges. Therefore, we conclude that the presented evidence is in line with the hypothesis that different parts of the noseleaves of Rhinolophidae are tuned to different frequency ranges with at least some of the most conspicuous ones being tuned to the frequency modulated components of the calls-thus yielding strong evidence for the sensory importance of the component.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 191
JournalFrontiers in Physiology
Volume4 JUL
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Sep 30

Fingerprint

Echolocation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Vanderelst, Dieter ; Lee, Ya-Fu ; Geipel, Inga ; Kalko, Elisabeth K.V. ; Kuo, Yen Min ; Peremans, Herbert. / The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the frequency modulated (FM) component of the calls. In: Frontiers in Physiology. 2013 ; Vol. 4 JUL.
@article{840e55021f6c48738f84c09adacec900,
title = "The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the frequency modulated (FM) component of the calls",
abstract = "Bats of the family Rhinolophidae emit their echolocation calls through their nostrils and feature elaborate noseleaves shaping the directionality of the emissions. The calls of these bats consist of a long constant-frequency component preceded and/or followed by short frequency-modulated sweeps. While Rhinolophidae are known for their physiological specializations for processing the constant frequency part of the calls, previous evidence suggests that the noseleaves of these animals are tuned to the frequencies in the frequency modulated components of the calls. In this paper, we seek further support for this hypothesis by simulating the emission beam pattern of the bat Rhinolophus formosae. Filling the furrows of lancet and removing the basal lappets (i.e., two flaps on the noseleaf) we find that these conspicuous features of the noseleaf focus the emitted energy mostly for frequencies in the frequencymodulated components. Based on the assumption that this component of the call is used by the bats for ranging, we develop a qualitative model to assess the increase in performance due to the furrows and/or the lappets. The model confirms that both structures decrease the ambiguity in selecting relevant targets for ranging. The lappets and the furrows shape the emission beam for different spatial regions and frequency ranges. Therefore, we conclude that the presented evidence is in line with the hypothesis that different parts of the noseleaves of Rhinolophidae are tuned to different frequency ranges with at least some of the most conspicuous ones being tuned to the frequency modulated components of the calls-thus yielding strong evidence for the sensory importance of the component.",
author = "Dieter Vanderelst and Ya-Fu Lee and Inga Geipel and Kalko, {Elisabeth K.V.} and Kuo, {Yen Min} and Herbert Peremans",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3389/fphys.2013.00191",
language = "English",
volume = "4 JUL",
journal = "Frontiers in Physiology",
issn = "1664-042X",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the frequency modulated (FM) component of the calls. / Vanderelst, Dieter; Lee, Ya-Fu; Geipel, Inga; Kalko, Elisabeth K.V.; Kuo, Yen Min; Peremans, Herbert.

In: Frontiers in Physiology, Vol. 4 JUL, Article 191, 30.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the frequency modulated (FM) component of the calls

AU - Vanderelst, Dieter

AU - Lee, Ya-Fu

AU - Geipel, Inga

AU - Kalko, Elisabeth K.V.

AU - Kuo, Yen Min

AU - Peremans, Herbert

PY - 2013/9/30

Y1 - 2013/9/30

N2 - Bats of the family Rhinolophidae emit their echolocation calls through their nostrils and feature elaborate noseleaves shaping the directionality of the emissions. The calls of these bats consist of a long constant-frequency component preceded and/or followed by short frequency-modulated sweeps. While Rhinolophidae are known for their physiological specializations for processing the constant frequency part of the calls, previous evidence suggests that the noseleaves of these animals are tuned to the frequencies in the frequency modulated components of the calls. In this paper, we seek further support for this hypothesis by simulating the emission beam pattern of the bat Rhinolophus formosae. Filling the furrows of lancet and removing the basal lappets (i.e., two flaps on the noseleaf) we find that these conspicuous features of the noseleaf focus the emitted energy mostly for frequencies in the frequencymodulated components. Based on the assumption that this component of the call is used by the bats for ranging, we develop a qualitative model to assess the increase in performance due to the furrows and/or the lappets. The model confirms that both structures decrease the ambiguity in selecting relevant targets for ranging. The lappets and the furrows shape the emission beam for different spatial regions and frequency ranges. Therefore, we conclude that the presented evidence is in line with the hypothesis that different parts of the noseleaves of Rhinolophidae are tuned to different frequency ranges with at least some of the most conspicuous ones being tuned to the frequency modulated components of the calls-thus yielding strong evidence for the sensory importance of the component.

AB - Bats of the family Rhinolophidae emit their echolocation calls through their nostrils and feature elaborate noseleaves shaping the directionality of the emissions. The calls of these bats consist of a long constant-frequency component preceded and/or followed by short frequency-modulated sweeps. While Rhinolophidae are known for their physiological specializations for processing the constant frequency part of the calls, previous evidence suggests that the noseleaves of these animals are tuned to the frequencies in the frequency modulated components of the calls. In this paper, we seek further support for this hypothesis by simulating the emission beam pattern of the bat Rhinolophus formosae. Filling the furrows of lancet and removing the basal lappets (i.e., two flaps on the noseleaf) we find that these conspicuous features of the noseleaf focus the emitted energy mostly for frequencies in the frequencymodulated components. Based on the assumption that this component of the call is used by the bats for ranging, we develop a qualitative model to assess the increase in performance due to the furrows and/or the lappets. The model confirms that both structures decrease the ambiguity in selecting relevant targets for ranging. The lappets and the furrows shape the emission beam for different spatial regions and frequency ranges. Therefore, we conclude that the presented evidence is in line with the hypothesis that different parts of the noseleaves of Rhinolophidae are tuned to different frequency ranges with at least some of the most conspicuous ones being tuned to the frequency modulated components of the calls-thus yielding strong evidence for the sensory importance of the component.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884562738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884562738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2013.00191

DO - 10.3389/fphys.2013.00191

M3 - Article

C2 - 23882226

AN - SCOPUS:84884562738

VL - 4 JUL

JO - Frontiers in Physiology

JF - Frontiers in Physiology

SN - 1664-042X

M1 - Article 191

ER -