The reproducibility comparison of two intervertebral translation measurements in cervical flexion-extension

Shyi Kuen Wu, Jia Yuan Jou, Hsin Min Lee, Han Yu Chen, Fong-chin Su, Li-Chieh Kuo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background context: The abnormal translations between vertebrae in the sagittal plane are important clues to spinal dysfunction or instability. Several studies have reported significant variability in their translation measurements with no analysis of data reproducibility. Purpose: We sought to determine the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the computer-assisted geometric midplanes and rotation matrix methods in the measurements of intervertebral translations at different motion ranges of cervical flexion-extension in asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients. Study design: A blind, repeated-measure design was applied to determine the reproducibility for intervertebral translation measurements. Methods: A total of 608 videofluoroscopic image sequences from the different motion ranges of cervical flexion and extension in 38 asymptomatic subjects and 38 disc-herniated patients were digitized for further analysis. Results: The intra- and interobserver reproducibility on measuring the sequential translations were in the acceptable range for geometric midplanes method (average intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.860 and 0.806; mean absolute difference [MAD] 0.19 and 0.33 mm) and rotation matrix method (average ICCs, 0.807 and 0.735; MAD, 0.35 and 0.42 mm). There was significantly better reproducibility on the measurements of intervertebral translation for the geometric midplanes method than those of rotation matrix method (p=.001-.040). The absolute mean differences of the translation measurements between two image protocols averaged 11.2% and 10.8% for the asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients, respectively. Conclusions: Based on these results, both methods demonstrated acceptable reproducibility on the intervertebral translation measurements. The geometric midplanes method involving an averaging effect on the placements of vertebral landmarks and closer to center of rotation might reduce the errors in translation estimations. The rotation matrix protocol simultaneously illustrated horizontal and vertical translation motion despite greater digitizing and/or measurement errors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1083-1091
Number of pages9
JournalSpine Journal
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 May 1

Fingerprint

Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Articular Range of Motion
Spine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wu, Shyi Kuen ; Jou, Jia Yuan ; Lee, Hsin Min ; Chen, Han Yu ; Su, Fong-chin ; Kuo, Li-Chieh. / The reproducibility comparison of two intervertebral translation measurements in cervical flexion-extension. In: Spine Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 1083-1091.
@article{04a4fb1c7179449690d946fc0264ef01,
title = "The reproducibility comparison of two intervertebral translation measurements in cervical flexion-extension",
abstract = "Background context: The abnormal translations between vertebrae in the sagittal plane are important clues to spinal dysfunction or instability. Several studies have reported significant variability in their translation measurements with no analysis of data reproducibility. Purpose: We sought to determine the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the computer-assisted geometric midplanes and rotation matrix methods in the measurements of intervertebral translations at different motion ranges of cervical flexion-extension in asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients. Study design: A blind, repeated-measure design was applied to determine the reproducibility for intervertebral translation measurements. Methods: A total of 608 videofluoroscopic image sequences from the different motion ranges of cervical flexion and extension in 38 asymptomatic subjects and 38 disc-herniated patients were digitized for further analysis. Results: The intra- and interobserver reproducibility on measuring the sequential translations were in the acceptable range for geometric midplanes method (average intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.860 and 0.806; mean absolute difference [MAD] 0.19 and 0.33 mm) and rotation matrix method (average ICCs, 0.807 and 0.735; MAD, 0.35 and 0.42 mm). There was significantly better reproducibility on the measurements of intervertebral translation for the geometric midplanes method than those of rotation matrix method (p=.001-.040). The absolute mean differences of the translation measurements between two image protocols averaged 11.2{\%} and 10.8{\%} for the asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients, respectively. Conclusions: Based on these results, both methods demonstrated acceptable reproducibility on the intervertebral translation measurements. The geometric midplanes method involving an averaging effect on the placements of vertebral landmarks and closer to center of rotation might reduce the errors in translation estimations. The rotation matrix protocol simultaneously illustrated horizontal and vertical translation motion despite greater digitizing and/or measurement errors.",
author = "Wu, {Shyi Kuen} and Jou, {Jia Yuan} and Lee, {Hsin Min} and Chen, {Han Yu} and Fong-chin Su and Li-Chieh Kuo",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.097",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1083--1091",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

The reproducibility comparison of two intervertebral translation measurements in cervical flexion-extension. / Wu, Shyi Kuen; Jou, Jia Yuan; Lee, Hsin Min; Chen, Han Yu; Su, Fong-chin; Kuo, Li-Chieh.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 15, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 1083-1091.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reproducibility comparison of two intervertebral translation measurements in cervical flexion-extension

AU - Wu, Shyi Kuen

AU - Jou, Jia Yuan

AU - Lee, Hsin Min

AU - Chen, Han Yu

AU - Su, Fong-chin

AU - Kuo, Li-Chieh

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Background context: The abnormal translations between vertebrae in the sagittal plane are important clues to spinal dysfunction or instability. Several studies have reported significant variability in their translation measurements with no analysis of data reproducibility. Purpose: We sought to determine the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the computer-assisted geometric midplanes and rotation matrix methods in the measurements of intervertebral translations at different motion ranges of cervical flexion-extension in asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients. Study design: A blind, repeated-measure design was applied to determine the reproducibility for intervertebral translation measurements. Methods: A total of 608 videofluoroscopic image sequences from the different motion ranges of cervical flexion and extension in 38 asymptomatic subjects and 38 disc-herniated patients were digitized for further analysis. Results: The intra- and interobserver reproducibility on measuring the sequential translations were in the acceptable range for geometric midplanes method (average intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.860 and 0.806; mean absolute difference [MAD] 0.19 and 0.33 mm) and rotation matrix method (average ICCs, 0.807 and 0.735; MAD, 0.35 and 0.42 mm). There was significantly better reproducibility on the measurements of intervertebral translation for the geometric midplanes method than those of rotation matrix method (p=.001-.040). The absolute mean differences of the translation measurements between two image protocols averaged 11.2% and 10.8% for the asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients, respectively. Conclusions: Based on these results, both methods demonstrated acceptable reproducibility on the intervertebral translation measurements. The geometric midplanes method involving an averaging effect on the placements of vertebral landmarks and closer to center of rotation might reduce the errors in translation estimations. The rotation matrix protocol simultaneously illustrated horizontal and vertical translation motion despite greater digitizing and/or measurement errors.

AB - Background context: The abnormal translations between vertebrae in the sagittal plane are important clues to spinal dysfunction or instability. Several studies have reported significant variability in their translation measurements with no analysis of data reproducibility. Purpose: We sought to determine the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the computer-assisted geometric midplanes and rotation matrix methods in the measurements of intervertebral translations at different motion ranges of cervical flexion-extension in asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients. Study design: A blind, repeated-measure design was applied to determine the reproducibility for intervertebral translation measurements. Methods: A total of 608 videofluoroscopic image sequences from the different motion ranges of cervical flexion and extension in 38 asymptomatic subjects and 38 disc-herniated patients were digitized for further analysis. Results: The intra- and interobserver reproducibility on measuring the sequential translations were in the acceptable range for geometric midplanes method (average intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.860 and 0.806; mean absolute difference [MAD] 0.19 and 0.33 mm) and rotation matrix method (average ICCs, 0.807 and 0.735; MAD, 0.35 and 0.42 mm). There was significantly better reproducibility on the measurements of intervertebral translation for the geometric midplanes method than those of rotation matrix method (p=.001-.040). The absolute mean differences of the translation measurements between two image protocols averaged 11.2% and 10.8% for the asymptomatic subjects and disc-herniated patients, respectively. Conclusions: Based on these results, both methods demonstrated acceptable reproducibility on the intervertebral translation measurements. The geometric midplanes method involving an averaging effect on the placements of vertebral landmarks and closer to center of rotation might reduce the errors in translation estimations. The rotation matrix protocol simultaneously illustrated horizontal and vertical translation motion despite greater digitizing and/or measurement errors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937968869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937968869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.097

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.097

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1083

EP - 1091

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 5

ER -