The study of the chin bar standard problem of motorbike helmet

L. T. Chang, Chih-Han Chang, C. Y. Lin, G. L. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The craniofacial injuries for motorcyclists are widespreading and serious problems around the world. The incidence and severity of brain injuries resulted from facial and cranial injuries are almost the same. However, the motorbike helmet has drawn a lot of research attention in preventing brain injuries while the chin bar, which protects face impact directly, has been ignored for a long time. Snell Memorial Foundation of U.S.A and British are the few that have enacted the safety standard for the chin bar. Nevertheless their basic concepts are different from each other, and only the integral stiffness between chin bar and helmet is evaluated, which cannot represent the real world situation when accidents occur. A testing procedure for the chin bar was hence established in this study: a standard metal headform was secured to the helmet with a chin bar, then dropped face down along a rail to impact a flat steel anvil on the floor. The impact energy, acceleration and Gadd's severity index were measured from the headform as judgment criteria. The results, compared with the Snell and British standard, show that both standards testing methods were unrealistic. Therefore, the chin bars which were approved by the above standards could not prevent the brain injuries resulted from the face impact.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-230
Number of pages8
JournalChinese Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
Volume17
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Off-Road Motor Vehicles
Head Protective Devices
Chin
Brain Injuries
Brain
Facial Injuries
Steel
Testing
Accidents
Rails
Metals
Stiffness
Safety
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics

Cite this

@article{4bc5a585da364409b888526c726ba035,
title = "The study of the chin bar standard problem of motorbike helmet",
abstract = "The craniofacial injuries for motorcyclists are widespreading and serious problems around the world. The incidence and severity of brain injuries resulted from facial and cranial injuries are almost the same. However, the motorbike helmet has drawn a lot of research attention in preventing brain injuries while the chin bar, which protects face impact directly, has been ignored for a long time. Snell Memorial Foundation of U.S.A and British are the few that have enacted the safety standard for the chin bar. Nevertheless their basic concepts are different from each other, and only the integral stiffness between chin bar and helmet is evaluated, which cannot represent the real world situation when accidents occur. A testing procedure for the chin bar was hence established in this study: a standard metal headform was secured to the helmet with a chin bar, then dropped face down along a rail to impact a flat steel anvil on the floor. The impact energy, acceleration and Gadd's severity index were measured from the headform as judgment criteria. The results, compared with the Snell and British standard, show that both standards testing methods were unrealistic. Therefore, the chin bars which were approved by the above standards could not prevent the brain injuries resulted from the face impact.",
author = "Chang, {L. T.} and Chih-Han Chang and Lin, {C. Y.} and Chang, {G. L.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "223--230",
journal = "Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering",
issn = "1609-0985",
publisher = "Biomedical Engineering Society",
number = "4",

}

The study of the chin bar standard problem of motorbike helmet. / Chang, L. T.; Chang, Chih-Han; Lin, C. Y.; Chang, G. L.

In: Chinese Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1997, p. 223-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The study of the chin bar standard problem of motorbike helmet

AU - Chang, L. T.

AU - Chang, Chih-Han

AU - Lin, C. Y.

AU - Chang, G. L.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The craniofacial injuries for motorcyclists are widespreading and serious problems around the world. The incidence and severity of brain injuries resulted from facial and cranial injuries are almost the same. However, the motorbike helmet has drawn a lot of research attention in preventing brain injuries while the chin bar, which protects face impact directly, has been ignored for a long time. Snell Memorial Foundation of U.S.A and British are the few that have enacted the safety standard for the chin bar. Nevertheless their basic concepts are different from each other, and only the integral stiffness between chin bar and helmet is evaluated, which cannot represent the real world situation when accidents occur. A testing procedure for the chin bar was hence established in this study: a standard metal headform was secured to the helmet with a chin bar, then dropped face down along a rail to impact a flat steel anvil on the floor. The impact energy, acceleration and Gadd's severity index were measured from the headform as judgment criteria. The results, compared with the Snell and British standard, show that both standards testing methods were unrealistic. Therefore, the chin bars which were approved by the above standards could not prevent the brain injuries resulted from the face impact.

AB - The craniofacial injuries for motorcyclists are widespreading and serious problems around the world. The incidence and severity of brain injuries resulted from facial and cranial injuries are almost the same. However, the motorbike helmet has drawn a lot of research attention in preventing brain injuries while the chin bar, which protects face impact directly, has been ignored for a long time. Snell Memorial Foundation of U.S.A and British are the few that have enacted the safety standard for the chin bar. Nevertheless their basic concepts are different from each other, and only the integral stiffness between chin bar and helmet is evaluated, which cannot represent the real world situation when accidents occur. A testing procedure for the chin bar was hence established in this study: a standard metal headform was secured to the helmet with a chin bar, then dropped face down along a rail to impact a flat steel anvil on the floor. The impact energy, acceleration and Gadd's severity index were measured from the headform as judgment criteria. The results, compared with the Snell and British standard, show that both standards testing methods were unrealistic. Therefore, the chin bars which were approved by the above standards could not prevent the brain injuries resulted from the face impact.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031393835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031393835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 223

EP - 230

JO - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

JF - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

SN - 1609-0985

IS - 4

ER -