TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of fetal liver volume in normal pregnancy
T2 - A comparison of reproducibility with two-dimensional ultrasound and a search for a volume constant
AU - Chang, Fong Mlng
AU - Hsu, Keng F.U.
AU - Ko, Huei Chen
AU - Yao, Bor Lin
AU - Chang, Chiung Hsin
AU - Yu, Chen Hsiang
AU - Chen, Hsi Yao
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements-We thank Dr. Yu-Chan Hsu, Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, for her helpful discussion. We are grateful for the support of all the staff of the Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital. We also thank Ms. Yeh-Ching Cheng, Miss LiChen Chuang and Miss Chao-Yi Cheng for technical, statistical and secretarial assistance. This study was supported in part by a grant from National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH 85-022), and in part by a grant from the National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China (NSC 85-2331-B-006-038).
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - The purpose of this study are to compare the reproducibility of two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) in the assessment of fetal liver volume (LV), and to test whether the fetal LV assessed by the traditional method with 2DUS is equal to that with 3DUS in normal pregnancy. If significantly different, we then try to calculate a new constant of fetal LV for the traditional equation from the LV values obtained with 3DUS. In total, 30 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 30 weeks were included for the reproducibility test and 55 cases ranging from 20 to 31 weeks gestation were enrolled for finding a new volume constant of LV. The results showed that 3DUS is superior to 2DUS in the reproducibility test of fetal LV assessment. Moreover, the LV assessed with the traditional 2DUS method (identified as LV_42) was significantly smaller than that measured with 3DUS (P<0.001). If the traditional 2DUS equation is to be used, the multiplying factor in the equation for the calculation of LV should be modified to 0.55 (SE = 0.017, N = 55). With the new volume constant, the new derived LV with 2DUS (identified as LV 55) was not different from that with 3DUS (identified as LV_3D). In conclusion, we recommend that 3DUS, instead of 2DUS, should be used for reaching an accurate assessment of fetal LV. Otherwise, applying our new volume constant may be of help in detecting abnormal fetal liver growth when only 2DUS is available.
AB - The purpose of this study are to compare the reproducibility of two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) in the assessment of fetal liver volume (LV), and to test whether the fetal LV assessed by the traditional method with 2DUS is equal to that with 3DUS in normal pregnancy. If significantly different, we then try to calculate a new constant of fetal LV for the traditional equation from the LV values obtained with 3DUS. In total, 30 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 30 weeks were included for the reproducibility test and 55 cases ranging from 20 to 31 weeks gestation were enrolled for finding a new volume constant of LV. The results showed that 3DUS is superior to 2DUS in the reproducibility test of fetal LV assessment. Moreover, the LV assessed with the traditional 2DUS method (identified as LV_42) was significantly smaller than that measured with 3DUS (P<0.001). If the traditional 2DUS equation is to be used, the multiplying factor in the equation for the calculation of LV should be modified to 0.55 (SE = 0.017, N = 55). With the new volume constant, the new derived LV with 2DUS (identified as LV 55) was not different from that with 3DUS (identified as LV_3D). In conclusion, we recommend that 3DUS, instead of 2DUS, should be used for reaching an accurate assessment of fetal LV. Otherwise, applying our new volume constant may be of help in detecting abnormal fetal liver growth when only 2DUS is available.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030953607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030953607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0301-5629(96)00218-9
DO - 10.1016/S0301-5629(96)00218-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 9160906
AN - SCOPUS:0030953607
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 23
SP - 381
EP - 389
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 3
ER -