TY - JOUR
T1 - Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone
AU - Edgerton, Bradley C.
AU - An, Kai‐Nan ‐N
AU - Morrey, Bernard F.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1990/11
Y1 - 1990/11
N2 - This study correlated torsional strength reduction with circular defect size in cortical bone, to define the “stress riser” and “open‐section” effect of the defects. The experimental model was developed and verified. Circular defects from 10 to 60% of bone diameter were then created in paired sheep femora and the bones loaded to failure. Contrary to theory, this experimental study suggests that small defects (10%) of bone diameter cause no significant torsional strength reduction. A 20% defect caused a 34% decrease in strength, representing the “stress riser” dimension. Defects between 20 and 60% of bone diameter decreased strength linearly as a function of defect size, and thus no discrete “open section” dimension was identified. For circular defects we were unable to demonstrate a discrete “open section” effect at which dramatic strength reduction is observed. These data may prove to be helpful when planning surgery that involves placing defects in bone such as for infection, biopsy, and prosthesis removal. The accepted guideline to avoid defects of greater than 50% of the bone diameter may be too great. Our data reveal this 62% reduction in torque strength and 88% energy to failure exist with a 50% circular defect.
AB - This study correlated torsional strength reduction with circular defect size in cortical bone, to define the “stress riser” and “open‐section” effect of the defects. The experimental model was developed and verified. Circular defects from 10 to 60% of bone diameter were then created in paired sheep femora and the bones loaded to failure. Contrary to theory, this experimental study suggests that small defects (10%) of bone diameter cause no significant torsional strength reduction. A 20% defect caused a 34% decrease in strength, representing the “stress riser” dimension. Defects between 20 and 60% of bone diameter decreased strength linearly as a function of defect size, and thus no discrete “open section” dimension was identified. For circular defects we were unable to demonstrate a discrete “open section” effect at which dramatic strength reduction is observed. These data may prove to be helpful when planning surgery that involves placing defects in bone such as for infection, biopsy, and prosthesis removal. The accepted guideline to avoid defects of greater than 50% of the bone diameter may be too great. Our data reveal this 62% reduction in torque strength and 88% energy to failure exist with a 50% circular defect.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0025514223
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0025514223#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/jor.1100080610
DO - 10.1002/jor.1100080610
M3 - Article
C2 - 2213342
AN - SCOPUS:0025514223
SN - 0736-0266
VL - 8
SP - 851
EP - 855
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
IS - 6
ER -