TY - JOUR
T1 - Using the inverse method to investigate flow models for mixed convection of annular finned tube heat exchanger
AU - Chen, Han Taw
AU - You, Cheng Hui
AU - Hsu, Wei Lun
AU - Chang, Jiang Ren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 National Taiwan Ocean University. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The inverse heat conduction method (IHCM) and three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamic (CFD) in combination with Tm k are used to select the appropriate flow model and near-wall treatment for the mixed convection of the annular finned tube heat exchanger. Thus, the numerical results obtained by all k-e models and near-wall treatments are yielded for 4 m/s ≤ Va ≤ 5 m/s. First, IHCM combined with Tm k is applied to estimate h and Q values. The obtained estimates of h and Q are used as reference values for CFD. The results show that the Tk and h results obtained by the standard (STD) k-e model with the standard wall function (SWF) are closer to Tm k and the estimates of h than those by the realizable (REAL) and RNG k-e models with various wall functions for Va of 4e5 m/s. The h value obtained from the STD k-e model with SWF, Va = 5 m/s and S = 15 mm may be 1.14 times that of the RNG k-e model and 0.48 times that of the REAL k-e model. The h value of the RNG k-e model with SWF is about 1.6e1.7 times that with EWT for S = 5 mm and Va = 4 m/s and 5 m/s. These differences mean that the appropriate flow model needs to be varied with Va to obtain more accurate numerical results. The y of RNG and STD k-e models does not exceed 3. However, the y of the REAL k-e model exceeds 6. To our best knowledge, no studies have explored this issue and the present investigation tries to bridge this gap.
AB - The inverse heat conduction method (IHCM) and three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamic (CFD) in combination with Tm k are used to select the appropriate flow model and near-wall treatment for the mixed convection of the annular finned tube heat exchanger. Thus, the numerical results obtained by all k-e models and near-wall treatments are yielded for 4 m/s ≤ Va ≤ 5 m/s. First, IHCM combined with Tm k is applied to estimate h and Q values. The obtained estimates of h and Q are used as reference values for CFD. The results show that the Tk and h results obtained by the standard (STD) k-e model with the standard wall function (SWF) are closer to Tm k and the estimates of h than those by the realizable (REAL) and RNG k-e models with various wall functions for Va of 4e5 m/s. The h value obtained from the STD k-e model with SWF, Va = 5 m/s and S = 15 mm may be 1.14 times that of the RNG k-e model and 0.48 times that of the REAL k-e model. The h value of the RNG k-e model with SWF is about 1.6e1.7 times that with EWT for S = 5 mm and Va = 4 m/s and 5 m/s. These differences mean that the appropriate flow model needs to be varied with Va to obtain more accurate numerical results. The y of RNG and STD k-e models does not exceed 3. However, the y of the REAL k-e model exceeds 6. To our best knowledge, no studies have explored this issue and the present investigation tries to bridge this gap.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120907782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120907782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.51400/2709-6998.2467
DO - 10.51400/2709-6998.2467
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120907782
SN - 1023-2796
VL - 29
SP - 652
EP - 665
JO - Journal of Marine Science and Technology (Taiwan)
JF - Journal of Marine Science and Technology (Taiwan)
IS - 5
ER -