Uterine sarcoma part III—Targeted therapy: The Taiwan Association of Gynecology (TAG) systematic review

The Taiwan Association of Gynecology Systematic Review Group

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)


Uterine sarcoma is a very aggressive and highly lethal disease. Even after a comprehensive staging surgery or en block cytoreduction surgery followed by multimodality therapy (often chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy), many patients relapse or present with distant metastases, and finally die of diseases. The worst outcome of uterine sarcomas is partly because of their rarity, unknown etiology, and highly divergent genetic aberration. Uterine sarcomas are often classified into four distinct subtypes, including uterine leiomyosarcoma, low-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma, high-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Currently, evidence from tumor biology found that these tumors showed alternation and/or mutation of genomes and the intracellular signal pathway. In addition, some preclinical studies showed promising results for targeting receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, various kinds of growth factor pathways, Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway, transforming growth factor β/bone morphogenetic protein signal pathway, aurora kinase A, MDM2 proto-oncogene, histone deacetylases, sex hormone receptors, certain types of oncoproteins, and/or loss of tumor suppressor genes. The current review is attempted to summarize the recurrent advance of targeted therapy for uterine sarcomas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-634
Number of pages10
JournalTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Oct 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Uterine sarcoma part III—Targeted therapy: The Taiwan Association of Gynecology (TAG) systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this