Validating ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Claims Database

Cheng Yang Hsieh, Po Ting Chen, Shih Chieh Shao, Swu Jane Lin, Shu Chen Liao, Edward Chia Cheng Lai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in Taiwan’s insurance claims database. Methods: We identified adult patients hospitalized at any Chang Gung Memorial Foundation branch hospital between January 1st, 2017, and December 31st, 2022, with ICD-10 code G61.0 in any of the five discharge diagnosis positions, indicating possible Guillain- Barré syndrome. We then validated the possible GBS diagnosis using data from electronic medical records of the identified patients, based on the diagnostic criteria established by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. We determined the positive predictive values (PPV) of various operational definitions, including the position (primary or other) where the code was recorded in the discharge diagnosis, nerve conduction study (NCS) claims, and/or specific GBS treatments. Results: The final validation cohort of 484 patients with ICD-10 code for GBS in the discharge diagnosis was found to include 368 true GBS patients. Identifying inpatients using only the ICD-10 code for GBS in any of the five positions for discharge diagnosis yielded a PPV of 76.0%. With more restrictive definitions (primary diagnosis only, or requiring additional claims for NCS and/or treatments), the PPV tended to increase, but with fewer true GBS patients identified. Using ICD-10 GBS code in the primary diagnosis plus NCS and treatment claims yielded the highest PPV (98.3%); however, 140 (38.0%) of the true GBS patients were missed using this definition. In contrast, using the ICD-10 GBS code in any position, plus claims for NCS, achieved a relatively good PPV (85.8%) with minimal loss of true GBS patients (13, ie, 3.5%). Conclusion: In Taiwan’s NHI claims data, identifying true GBS patients using only the ICD-10 code yielded a PPV of 76.0%; however, adding claims for diagnostic procedure and GBS treatment increased the PPV to 98.3%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)733-742
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Epidemiology
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validating ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Claims Database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this