TY - GEN
T1 - Vibration control of rotor systems with noncollocated Sensor/Actuator by experimental design
AU - Yang, S. M.
AU - Sheu, G. J.
AU - Yang, C. D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1995 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). All rights reserved.
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - This paper presents a controller design methodology for vibration suppression of rotor systems in noncollocated sensor/actuator configuration. The methodology combines the experimental design method of quality engineering and the active damping control technique such that their advantages in implementation feasibility and performance-robustness can be integrated together. Compared with LQ-based design, the controller order is smaller and it is applicable to systems in an operation speed range. In addition, neither preselected sensor/actuator location nor state measurement/ estimation is needed. By using the locations of sensor/actuator and the feedback gains as design parameters, the controller is shown to achieve the best possible system performance while maintaining the closed loop system stability. Analyses also show that, contrary to common believe, the performance of a closed loop system with noncollocated sensor/actuator can be superior to that with a collocated one.
AB - This paper presents a controller design methodology for vibration suppression of rotor systems in noncollocated sensor/actuator configuration. The methodology combines the experimental design method of quality engineering and the active damping control technique such that their advantages in implementation feasibility and performance-robustness can be integrated together. Compared with LQ-based design, the controller order is smaller and it is applicable to systems in an operation speed range. In addition, neither preselected sensor/actuator location nor state measurement/ estimation is needed. By using the locations of sensor/actuator and the feedback gains as design parameters, the controller is shown to achieve the best possible system performance while maintaining the closed loop system stability. Analyses also show that, contrary to common believe, the performance of a closed loop system with noncollocated sensor/actuator can be superior to that with a collocated one.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930433435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930433435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/DETC1995-0468
DO - 10.1115/DETC1995-0468
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84930433435
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
SP - 755
EP - 764
BT - 15th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise - Acoustics, Vibrations, and Rotating Machines
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 1995 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC 1995, collocated with the ASME 1995 15th International Computers in Engineering Conference and the ASME 1995 9th Annual Engineering Database Symposium
Y2 - 17 September 1995 through 20 September 1995
ER -