A modified developmental care bundle reduces pain and stress in preterm infants undergoing examinations for retinopathy of prematurity: A randomised controlled trial

Ling Ju Chuang, Shih Hao Wang, Mi-Chia Ma, Chia Ni Lin, Chih Ling Chen, Mei-Chih Huang

研究成果: Article

1 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Aims and objectives: To determine the comparative efficacy of developmental care versus standard care for reducing pain and stress in preterm infants during examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Background: ROP examinations are routinely performed in neonatal intensive care units to detect these lesions. Pain scores recorded during and after eye examinations have revealed physiological and behavioural manifestations of pain and stress. Design: A randomised crossover trial was conducted. Methods: Fourteen preterm infants were evaluated. The modified developmental care bundle included environmental modifications, positioning and containment, oxygen supplementation, interaction and approach and cue-based individual care, which were applied before, during and after the ROP examination. The primary outcomes were obtained from pain and stress scores using the premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R) and a behavioural evaluation. The secondary outcomes were recovery time to the baseline of the vital signs and oxygen saturation. Results: Statistical significances were found in the care type comparison (p = 0.013), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.005) in the PIPP-R, and also in the care type comparison (p < 0.001), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.001) in the behavioural evaluation scores using a generalised estimating equation (GEE) analysis. Recovery time for the developmental care (N = 13, mean = 8.6 ± 11.5 min, 95% CI = 1.68–15.57) was significantly shorter than for the standard care (N = 11, mean = 25.5 ± 20.8 min, 95% CI = 11.45–39.46), which was found to be statistically significant according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (N = 11, p = 0.003). Conclusions: A bundled developmental care intervention significantly reduced pain and stress responses and the time needed for infants to recover their physiological status following the procedure. Relevance to clinical practice: Since the results show the benefits of developmental care in an ROP examination, it can be the practical evidence basis by which to develop a standard of procedure or guideline for clinical practice.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)545-559
頁數15
期刊Journal of Clinical Nursing
28
發行號3-4
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2019 二月 1

指紋

Patient Care Bundles
Retinopathy of Prematurity
Premature Infants
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Oxygen
Vital Signs
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Standard of Care
Nonparametric Statistics
Practice Guidelines
Cross-Over Studies
Reaction Time
Cues

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nursing(all)

引用此文

@article{fba9f6b1e29d4f30b23a46f477a7a27f,
title = "A modified developmental care bundle reduces pain and stress in preterm infants undergoing examinations for retinopathy of prematurity: A randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To determine the comparative efficacy of developmental care versus standard care for reducing pain and stress in preterm infants during examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Background: ROP examinations are routinely performed in neonatal intensive care units to detect these lesions. Pain scores recorded during and after eye examinations have revealed physiological and behavioural manifestations of pain and stress. Design: A randomised crossover trial was conducted. Methods: Fourteen preterm infants were evaluated. The modified developmental care bundle included environmental modifications, positioning and containment, oxygen supplementation, interaction and approach and cue-based individual care, which were applied before, during and after the ROP examination. The primary outcomes were obtained from pain and stress scores using the premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R) and a behavioural evaluation. The secondary outcomes were recovery time to the baseline of the vital signs and oxygen saturation. Results: Statistical significances were found in the care type comparison (p = 0.013), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.005) in the PIPP-R, and also in the care type comparison (p < 0.001), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.001) in the behavioural evaluation scores using a generalised estimating equation (GEE) analysis. Recovery time for the developmental care (N = 13, mean = 8.6 ± 11.5 min, 95{\%} CI = 1.68–15.57) was significantly shorter than for the standard care (N = 11, mean = 25.5 ± 20.8 min, 95{\%} CI = 11.45–39.46), which was found to be statistically significant according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (N = 11, p = 0.003). Conclusions: A bundled developmental care intervention significantly reduced pain and stress responses and the time needed for infants to recover their physiological status following the procedure. Relevance to clinical practice: Since the results show the benefits of developmental care in an ROP examination, it can be the practical evidence basis by which to develop a standard of procedure or guideline for clinical practice.",
author = "Chuang, {Ling Ju} and Wang, {Shih Hao} and Mi-Chia Ma and Lin, {Chia Ni} and Chen, {Chih Ling} and Mei-Chih Huang",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.14645",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "545--559",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A modified developmental care bundle reduces pain and stress in preterm infants undergoing examinations for retinopathy of prematurity

T2 - A randomised controlled trial

AU - Chuang, Ling Ju

AU - Wang, Shih Hao

AU - Ma, Mi-Chia

AU - Lin, Chia Ni

AU - Chen, Chih Ling

AU - Huang, Mei-Chih

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Aims and objectives: To determine the comparative efficacy of developmental care versus standard care for reducing pain and stress in preterm infants during examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Background: ROP examinations are routinely performed in neonatal intensive care units to detect these lesions. Pain scores recorded during and after eye examinations have revealed physiological and behavioural manifestations of pain and stress. Design: A randomised crossover trial was conducted. Methods: Fourteen preterm infants were evaluated. The modified developmental care bundle included environmental modifications, positioning and containment, oxygen supplementation, interaction and approach and cue-based individual care, which were applied before, during and after the ROP examination. The primary outcomes were obtained from pain and stress scores using the premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R) and a behavioural evaluation. The secondary outcomes were recovery time to the baseline of the vital signs and oxygen saturation. Results: Statistical significances were found in the care type comparison (p = 0.013), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.005) in the PIPP-R, and also in the care type comparison (p < 0.001), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.001) in the behavioural evaluation scores using a generalised estimating equation (GEE) analysis. Recovery time for the developmental care (N = 13, mean = 8.6 ± 11.5 min, 95% CI = 1.68–15.57) was significantly shorter than for the standard care (N = 11, mean = 25.5 ± 20.8 min, 95% CI = 11.45–39.46), which was found to be statistically significant according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (N = 11, p = 0.003). Conclusions: A bundled developmental care intervention significantly reduced pain and stress responses and the time needed for infants to recover their physiological status following the procedure. Relevance to clinical practice: Since the results show the benefits of developmental care in an ROP examination, it can be the practical evidence basis by which to develop a standard of procedure or guideline for clinical practice.

AB - Aims and objectives: To determine the comparative efficacy of developmental care versus standard care for reducing pain and stress in preterm infants during examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Background: ROP examinations are routinely performed in neonatal intensive care units to detect these lesions. Pain scores recorded during and after eye examinations have revealed physiological and behavioural manifestations of pain and stress. Design: A randomised crossover trial was conducted. Methods: Fourteen preterm infants were evaluated. The modified developmental care bundle included environmental modifications, positioning and containment, oxygen supplementation, interaction and approach and cue-based individual care, which were applied before, during and after the ROP examination. The primary outcomes were obtained from pain and stress scores using the premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R) and a behavioural evaluation. The secondary outcomes were recovery time to the baseline of the vital signs and oxygen saturation. Results: Statistical significances were found in the care type comparison (p = 0.013), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.005) in the PIPP-R, and also in the care type comparison (p < 0.001), time comparison (p < 0.001) and type-by-time interaction (p = 0.001) in the behavioural evaluation scores using a generalised estimating equation (GEE) analysis. Recovery time for the developmental care (N = 13, mean = 8.6 ± 11.5 min, 95% CI = 1.68–15.57) was significantly shorter than for the standard care (N = 11, mean = 25.5 ± 20.8 min, 95% CI = 11.45–39.46), which was found to be statistically significant according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (N = 11, p = 0.003). Conclusions: A bundled developmental care intervention significantly reduced pain and stress responses and the time needed for infants to recover their physiological status following the procedure. Relevance to clinical practice: Since the results show the benefits of developmental care in an ROP examination, it can be the practical evidence basis by which to develop a standard of procedure or guideline for clinical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052936848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052936848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.14645

DO - 10.1111/jocn.14645

M3 - Article

C2 - 30091495

AN - SCOPUS:85052936848

VL - 28

SP - 545

EP - 559

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 3-4

ER -