TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase II randomised trial of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer
T2 - the Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group T2212 study
AU - Su, Yung Yeh
AU - Chiu, Yen Feng
AU - Li, Chung Pin
AU - Yang, Shih Hung
AU - Lin, Johnson
AU - Lin, Shyh Jer
AU - Chang, Ping Ying
AU - Chiang, Nai Jung
AU - Shan, Yan Shen
AU - Ch’ang, Hui Ju
AU - Chen, Li Tzong
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all the hospitals for enrolling patients in this trial including National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan (to Y-SS, N-JC); Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City (to C-PL); Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei (to JL); National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City (to S-HY); Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City (to S-JL, Ming-Sun Yu), Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei (to P-YC, J-HC), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan (to J-SC) and Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City (to Her-Shyong Shiah). We are grateful for the participation of all the patients and their families and to make this study possible, and also for the help of research nurses and statisticians from the Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group. In particular, we would like to thank Ms. Shu-Chuan Lai for her tremendous efforts in the comprehensive statistical analyses of this trial. Oxaliplatin (Oxalip?) and irinotecan (Irino?) were kindly sponsored by TTY Biopharm Company Limited, Taipei, Taiwan.
Funding Information:
L-TC reports research funding from Novartis, Merck, Serono, TTY, Polaris, SyncorePharm, Pfizer, BMS; honoraria from ONO, Eli Lilly, MSD, PharmaEngine, TTY, SyncorePharm, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Ipsen; patents and royalties from ENO-1mAb/ HuniLife; membership on Board of Directors of ScinoPharm, Taiwan, Ltd. and on Scientific Advisory Committee of PharmaEngine. All the remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy (ICT), GOFL (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin) versus modified FOLFIRINOX (irinotecan, oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/leucovorin), followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). Methods: Chemo-naive patients with measurable LAPC were eligible and randomly assigned to receive biweekly ICT with either mFOLFIRINOX or GOFL for 3 months. Patients without systemic progression would have 5-FU- or gemcitabine-based CCRT (5040 cGy/28 fractions) and were then subjected to surgery or continuation of chemotherapy until treatment failure. The primary endpoint was 9-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Results: Between July 2013 and January 2019, 55 patients were enrolled. After ICT, 21 (77.8%) of 27 patients who received mFOLFIRINOX and 17 (60.7%) of 28 patients who received GOFL completed CCRT. Of them, one and five had per-protocol R0/R1 resection. On intent-to-treat analysis, the 9-month PFS rate, median PFS and overall survival in mFOLFIRINOX and GOFL arms were 30.5% versus 35.9%, 6.6 (95% confidence interval: 5.9–12.5) versus 7.6 months (3.9–12.3) and 19.6 (13.4–22.9) versus 17.9 months (13.4–23.9), respectively. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and diarrhoea during induction mFOLFIRINOX and GOFL were 37.0% versus 21.4% and 14.8% versus 3.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Induction GOFL and mFOLFIRINOX followed by CCRT provided similar clinical outcomes in LAPC patients. Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT01867892.
AB - Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy (ICT), GOFL (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin) versus modified FOLFIRINOX (irinotecan, oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/leucovorin), followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). Methods: Chemo-naive patients with measurable LAPC were eligible and randomly assigned to receive biweekly ICT with either mFOLFIRINOX or GOFL for 3 months. Patients without systemic progression would have 5-FU- or gemcitabine-based CCRT (5040 cGy/28 fractions) and were then subjected to surgery or continuation of chemotherapy until treatment failure. The primary endpoint was 9-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Results: Between July 2013 and January 2019, 55 patients were enrolled. After ICT, 21 (77.8%) of 27 patients who received mFOLFIRINOX and 17 (60.7%) of 28 patients who received GOFL completed CCRT. Of them, one and five had per-protocol R0/R1 resection. On intent-to-treat analysis, the 9-month PFS rate, median PFS and overall survival in mFOLFIRINOX and GOFL arms were 30.5% versus 35.9%, 6.6 (95% confidence interval: 5.9–12.5) versus 7.6 months (3.9–12.3) and 19.6 (13.4–22.9) versus 17.9 months (13.4–23.9), respectively. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and diarrhoea during induction mFOLFIRINOX and GOFL were 37.0% versus 21.4% and 14.8% versus 3.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Induction GOFL and mFOLFIRINOX followed by CCRT provided similar clinical outcomes in LAPC patients. Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT01867892.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121422288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121422288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-021-01649-7
DO - 10.1038/s41416-021-01649-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121422288
VL - 126
SP - 1018
EP - 1026
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
SN - 0007-0920
IS - 7
ER -