TY - JOUR
T1 - Antimalarial primaquine for spinal sensory and motor blockade in rats
AU - Chou, An Kuo
AU - Chiu, Chong Chi
AU - Wang, Jhi Joung
AU - Chen, Yu Wen
AU - Hung, Ching Hsia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2021/10/7
Y1 - 2021/10/7
N2 - OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the experiment was to estimate whether intrathecal antimalarial drugs could provoke spinal block, and their comparison with lidocaine. METHODS: Rats were intrathecally administrated with antimalarial agents (primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine) and lidocaine, and neurobehavioural examinations (nociception, proprioception and motor function) were assessed; n = 8 per group. One-way and two-way analysis of variance were designed to analyse data. KEY FINDINGS: At a concentration of 20 mM, primaquine (0.46 mg/rat) exhibited the longest duration and the most potent effect of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor blockade (P < 0.01) among five drugs, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency of spinal blockade compared with lidocaine (0.29 mg/rat). In dose-dependent studies, primaquine was more potent (P < 0.01) than lidocaine for spinal block. At ED25, ED50 and ED75 equipotent doses, primaquine produced a greater duration of spinal motor, proprioceptive and nociceptive blockade when compared with lidocaine (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine produced spinal blockade. Primaquine was more potent and displayed a prolonged life of local anaesthetic effect compared with lidocaine, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency compared with lidocaine.
AB - OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the experiment was to estimate whether intrathecal antimalarial drugs could provoke spinal block, and their comparison with lidocaine. METHODS: Rats were intrathecally administrated with antimalarial agents (primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine) and lidocaine, and neurobehavioural examinations (nociception, proprioception and motor function) were assessed; n = 8 per group. One-way and two-way analysis of variance were designed to analyse data. KEY FINDINGS: At a concentration of 20 mM, primaquine (0.46 mg/rat) exhibited the longest duration and the most potent effect of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor blockade (P < 0.01) among five drugs, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency of spinal blockade compared with lidocaine (0.29 mg/rat). In dose-dependent studies, primaquine was more potent (P < 0.01) than lidocaine for spinal block. At ED25, ED50 and ED75 equipotent doses, primaquine produced a greater duration of spinal motor, proprioceptive and nociceptive blockade when compared with lidocaine (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine produced spinal blockade. Primaquine was more potent and displayed a prolonged life of local anaesthetic effect compared with lidocaine, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency compared with lidocaine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118283451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118283451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jpp/rgab054
DO - 10.1093/jpp/rgab054
M3 - Article
C2 - 34370863
AN - SCOPUS:85118283451
VL - 73
SP - 1513
EP - 1519
JO - Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
JF - Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
SN - 0022-3573
IS - 11
ER -