TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion by able-bodied subjects
AU - Ruggles, D. L.
AU - Cahalan, T.
AU - An, K. N.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2004 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - The mechanical parameters of wheelchair propulsion were measured using 10 able-bodied participants. A roller system connected to a Cybex Isokinetic Machine was designed for measurement of the torque and angular displacement of the wheels during propulsion. The peak torque, angular displacement, work, and angular impulse were measured and calculated. Three types of wheelchairs, one from each of the following categories based on popularity, were evaluated: (1) lightweight, collapsible, nonadjustable Everest and Jennings Premier II (EJ); (2) lightweight, collapsible, adjustable Quickie II (Q2); and (3) lightweight, rigid-framed, adjustable Quickie GPV (Q1). Significant differences were found in certain mechanical parameters with propulsion of the three different types of wheelchairs. The work performed by each single stroke and the angular impulses are higher for the Q2 and Q1 than those of the EJ. These findings support the concept that wheelchair design and dimensions relative to the anthropometry of the user have great influence on the characteristics of wheelchair propulsion.
AB - The mechanical parameters of wheelchair propulsion were measured using 10 able-bodied participants. A roller system connected to a Cybex Isokinetic Machine was designed for measurement of the torque and angular displacement of the wheels during propulsion. The peak torque, angular displacement, work, and angular impulse were measured and calculated. Three types of wheelchairs, one from each of the following categories based on popularity, were evaluated: (1) lightweight, collapsible, nonadjustable Everest and Jennings Premier II (EJ); (2) lightweight, collapsible, adjustable Quickie II (Q2); and (3) lightweight, rigid-framed, adjustable Quickie GPV (Q1). Significant differences were found in certain mechanical parameters with propulsion of the three different types of wheelchairs. The work performed by each single stroke and the angular impulses are higher for the Q2 and Q1 than those of the EJ. These findings support the concept that wheelchair design and dimensions relative to the anthropometry of the user have great influence on the characteristics of wheelchair propulsion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028340902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028340902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 8185446
AN - SCOPUS:0028340902
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 75
SP - 540
EP - 544
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 5
ER -